Skip to content

Conversation

@abnegate
Copy link
Member

@abnegate abnegate commented Jul 25, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved efficiency when fetching many-to-many relationships, resulting in faster data retrieval.
    • Clarified error messages for invalid relationship values and cursor document collection mismatches.
  • Tests

    • Added tests to verify that selection queries on many-to-many relationships return only requested fields, including nested relationships.
  • Chores

    • Updated environment configuration for testing services.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Walkthrough

A new environment variable was added to the Docker Compose test service. The database relationship population logic was optimized for many-to-many queries by batching related document retrieval. Minor code cleanups and clearer error messages were applied. Two new end-to-end tests were introduced to validate selective field retrieval in many-to-many and nested many-to-many relationships.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docker-compose.yml Added PHP_IDE_CONFIG=serverName=tests to the tests service environment.
src/Database/Database.php Optimized many-to-many relationship fetching to use batch queries; removed redundant blank line; improved error messages and conditional formatting; fixed exception message capitalization.
tests/e2e/Adapter/Scopes/Relationships/ManyToManyTests.php Added two test methods for selecting fields in many-to-many and nested many-to-many relationships.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes

Poem

In the warren of code, a batch query hops,
Fetching many-to-many with fewer stops.
New tests now check what fields we select,
While Docker’s config gets IDE respect.
With paws on the keyboard, I gleefully see—
More efficient, more tested, as happy as can be! 🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0526408 and 175757f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Database/Database.php (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/Database/Database.php
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-many-select

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docker-compose.yml (1)

21-21: Quote the value for consistency & to avoid edge-case YAML parsing quirks

While unquoted scalars containing = are generally fine, quoting the value makes the intention explicit and aligns with the map-style environment blocks elsewhere in the file.

-      PHP_IDE_CONFIG: serverName=tests
+      PHP_IDE_CONFIG: "serverName=tests"
tests/e2e/Adapter/Scopes/Relationships/ManyToManyTests.php (1)

1549-1549: Remove unused variable.

The $doc1 variable is assigned but never used in the test method.

-        $doc1 = $database->createDocument('select_m2m_collection1', new Document([
+        $database->createDocument('select_m2m_collection1', new Document([
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a29d70d and 0526408.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
  • src/Database/Database.php (4 hunks)
  • tests/e2e/Adapter/Scopes/Relationships/ManyToManyTests.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 PHPMD (2.15.0)
tests/e2e/Adapter/Scopes/Relationships/ManyToManyTests.php

1549-1549: Avoid unused local variables such as '$doc1'. (Unused Code Rules)

(UnusedLocalVariable)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
docker-compose.yml (1)

20-21: Environment variable addition is correct and useful for IDE ⇄ Xdebug mapping

The PHP_IDE_CONFIG variable is syntactically valid and should help the debugger resolve path mappings inside the container. Nothing else to flag.

src/Database/Database.php (4)

4342-4342: LGTM: Improved error message capitalization.

Minor improvement to capitalize "Collection" in the exception message for better consistency and readability.


4523-4535: Excellent optimization for many-to-many relationship fetching.

This change significantly improves performance by replacing multiple individual getDocument calls with a single batch find query. The optimization:

  1. ✅ Collects all related IDs from junction documents
  2. ✅ Performs a single batch query using Query::equal('$id', $relatedIds)
  3. ✅ Maintains the same filtering and selection logic
  4. ✅ Includes proper empty check to avoid unnecessary queries

This should reduce database round-trips from N+1 to 2 queries (1 for junction + 1 for related documents) for many-to-many relationships.


4645-4645: LGTM: Improved error message clarity.

Minor improvement to the exception message for better readability and grammar consistency.


4492-4494: Relationship update logic verified

The change to include RELATION_MANY_TO_ONE with RELATION_SIDE_PARENT alongside RELATION_ONE_TO_ONE correctly normalizes unchanged Document instances to their IDs and skips redundant processing. Our codebase’s extensive end-to-end tests cover all relationship types and deletion/create flows, and no regressions have been observed.

tests/e2e/Adapter/Scopes/Relationships/ManyToManyTests.php (2)

1522-1598: Excellent test coverage for many-to-many field selection.

The test comprehensively validates that selective field retrieval works correctly in many-to-many relationships, ensuring only requested fields are returned while excluding unselected ones. The setup is clean and the assertions are thorough.


1600-1719: Outstanding test for nested many-to-many field selection.

This test excellently validates the core PR objective by testing complex nested selection across multiple collections with many-to-many relationships. The three-tier structure (artists->albums->tracks) with dotted notation selection (albums.name, albums.tracks.title) comprehensively verifies that the field selection optimization works correctly at all relationship levels.

@abnegate abnegate merged commit f9b6c58 into main Jul 27, 2025
15 checks passed
@abnegate abnegate deleted the fix-many-select branch July 27, 2025 04:10
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants