-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Changing ErrMode::Cut to ErrMode::Backtrack to allow alt parser flow (Fix for uutils/coreutils issue 8754) #238
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
cakebaker
merged 1 commit into
uutils:main
from
stillbeingnick:bugfix/issue/coreutils-date-invalid
Oct 4, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
gnudate is happy with timestamps this far in the future or past
am I misinterpreting or is this test making sure parse_datetime (and thus uutils date) will reject such a large value?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the tests were written to ensure errors were produced at the boundary line of 13 whole digits. Which is a limitation somewhere during parsing or conversion, I honestly haven't tracked it down yet. The hope is that these tests provide a little future proofing. The failure of the tests during subsequent releases would signal a change in known current behavior.
As for what parse_datetime should do, the direction seems to be to align with current implementations of date. So, my vote would be to support that and align as closely as possible to current implementations.
I do think this warrants an issue to close the gap and figure out what is causing this to not handle the same size relative time values as gnudate.