Skip to content

Don't enforce client-side generated runId in start() for v1Compat#1178

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit intomainfrom
02-23-don_t_enforce_client-side_generated_runid_in_start_for_v1compat_
Feb 24, 2026
Merged

Don't enforce client-side generated runId in start() for v1Compat#1178
TooTallNate merged 1 commit intomainfrom
02-23-don_t_enforce_client-side_generated_runid_in_start_for_v1compat_

Conversation

@TooTallNate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@TooTallNate TooTallNate commented Feb 24, 2026

Removed client-side runId enforcement in the start() function when v1Compat mode is enabled.

What changed?

Modified the runId validation logic in packages/core/src/runtime/start.ts to skip the server-client runId comparison check when v1Compat is true. The validation now only throws a WorkflowRuntimeError for runId mismatches when not in v1 compatibility mode.

How to test?

  1. Test workflow startup with v1Compat enabled and verify that different runIds between client and server don't cause errors
  2. Test workflow startup with v1Compat disabled and confirm that runId mismatches still throw the expected WorkflowRuntimeError
  3. Verify that workflows continue to function normally in both compatibility modes

Why make this change?

This change maintains backward compatibility with v1 workflows that may not strictly enforce client-generated runIds, while preserving the validation behavior for newer workflow versions that expect consistent runId handling between client and server.

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Feb 24, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a1468c8

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 14 packages
Name Type
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Feb 24, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Feb 24, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.032s (+1.6%) 1.005s (~) 0.973s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.032s (+0.9%) 1.005s (~) 0.973s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.033s (-22.9% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.971s 10 1.04x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.045s (-4.0%) 1.005s (~) 0.959s 10 1.42x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.048s (+1.5%) 1.012s (~) 0.963s 10 1.50x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.055s (+4.8%) 1.010s (~) 0.955s 10 1.72x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.067s (+3.1%) 1.013s (-0.6%) 0.946s 10 2.07x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 0.097s (+7.3% 🔺) 1.008s (~) 0.911s 10 3.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.418s (-20.2% 🟢) 2.094s (-16.5% 🟢) 1.675s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 0.457s (-36.6% 🟢) 1.581s (-20.3% 🟢) 1.124s 10 1.09x
▲ Vercel Nitro 0.637s (+69.5% 🔺) 1.805s (-4.4%) 1.168s 10 1.52x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.070s (-2.6%) 2.005s (~) 0.935s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.108s (~) 2.006s (~) 0.898s 10 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 1.108s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.897s 10 1.04x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.115s (+0.8%) 2.006s (~) 0.892s 10 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.122s (~) 2.011s (~) 0.888s 10 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.133s (+0.7%) 2.011s (~) 0.878s 10 1.06x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.160s (+3.1%) 2.013s (~) 0.853s 10 1.08x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 1.311s (+0.5%) 2.009s (~) 0.698s 10 1.22x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.920s (-3.3%) 3.124s (-8.4% 🟢) 1.205s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 1.924s (~) 3.691s (+25.3% 🔺) 1.767s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.955s (-4.3%) 3.329s (-0.9%) 1.374s 10 1.02x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 10.604s (-1.1%) 11.022s (~) 0.418s 3 1.00x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 10.773s (+0.7%) 11.023s (~) 0.250s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Express 10.828s (~) 11.022s (~) 0.194s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 10.835s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.188s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 10.845s (~) 11.039s (~) 0.194s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.893s (~) 11.044s (~) 0.151s 3 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 11.043s (+1.8%) 11.717s (+6.2% 🔺) 0.673s 3 1.04x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 12.270s (~) 13.018s (~) 0.748s 3 1.16x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 15.777s (-8.1% 🟢) 16.911s (-5.4% 🟢) 1.134s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 16.015s (-3.5%) 17.422s (-1.6%) 1.407s 2 1.02x
▲ Vercel Express 16.323s (+1.5%) 17.893s (+2.6%) 1.570s 2 1.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 26.847s (-1.3%) 27.055s (-3.6%) 0.207s 3 1.00x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 27.045s (+0.5%) 27.720s (+2.5%) 0.675s 3 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 27.164s (~) 28.061s (~) 0.897s 3 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 27.297s (~) 28.069s (~) 0.771s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 27.476s (~) 28.051s (~) 0.575s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Express 27.485s (~) 28.051s (~) 0.566s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 27.611s (+1.4%) 28.073s (~) 0.462s 3 1.03x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 30.585s (~) 31.046s (~) 0.461s 2 1.14x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 41.117s (-0.6%) 42.473s (~) 1.356s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 41.641s (~) 42.827s (-1.5%) 1.187s 2 1.01x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 42.769s (~) 44.046s (-0.9%) 1.277s 2 1.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 54.616s (~) 55.102s (~) 0.486s 2 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 54.828s (~) 55.099s (~) 0.272s 2 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 55.139s (~) 56.099s (+1.8%) 0.960s 2 1.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 55.788s (-1.6%) 56.099s (-1.8%) 0.310s 2 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 55.813s (+1.5%) 56.126s (+1.9%) 0.314s 2 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 57.266s (~) 58.103s (+0.9%) 0.837s 2 1.05x
💻 Local Express 57.342s (~) 58.104s (~) 0.762s 2 1.05x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 61.208s (~) 62.094s (+0.8%) 0.887s 2 1.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 91.260s (+1.6%) 92.106s (+1.8%) 0.846s 1 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 92.166s (+4.3%) 93.507s (+4.6%) 1.341s 1 1.01x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 95.576s (+5.3% 🔺) 96.089s (+4.2%) 0.513s 1 1.05x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.265s (+1.8%) 2.006s (~) 0.742s 15 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.362s (-2.7%) 2.006s (~) 0.644s 15 1.08x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.368s (+2.0%) 2.010s (~) 0.642s 15 1.08x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.369s (+0.8%) 2.010s (~) 0.641s 15 1.08x
💻 Local Nitro 1.391s (-1.1%) 2.005s (~) 0.614s 15 1.10x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.394s (+1.2%) 2.012s (~) 0.617s 15 1.10x
💻 Local Express 1.429s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.576s 15 1.13x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 2.174s (+0.7%) 3.008s (~) 0.834s 10 1.72x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.254s (-5.4% 🟢) 3.956s (+17.0% 🔺) 1.702s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.732s (+18.3% 🔺) 4.043s (+9.0% 🔺) 1.310s 8 1.21x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.770s (-1.4%) 3.637s (-10.4% 🟢) 0.866s 9 1.23x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.045s (+3.4%) 2.598s (+3.4%) 0.552s 12 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.053s (+3.6%) 2.515s (+4.8%) 0.462s 12 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.059s (+4.0%) 2.601s (+5.1% 🔺) 0.542s 12 1.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.291s (-9.4% 🟢) 3.007s (~) 0.716s 10 1.12x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.508s (~) 3.008s (~) 0.500s 10 1.23x
💻 Local Nitro 2.568s (~) 3.007s (~) 0.438s 10 1.26x
💻 Local Express 2.632s (-0.8%) 3.007s (~) 0.376s 10 1.29x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 4.724s (-0.7%) 5.176s (~) 0.452s 6 2.31x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.383s (~) 3.468s (+2.9%) 1.085s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.858s (+10.3% 🔺) 3.978s (+3.7%) 1.120s 8 1.20x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.873s (+9.6% 🔺) 3.832s (-8.5% 🟢) 0.959s 8 1.21x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.478s (-6.2% 🟢) 4.145s (-3.0%) 0.667s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.817s (-1.9%) 4.452s (-6.0% 🟢) 0.635s 7 1.10x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.819s (+4.0%) 4.746s (+3.4%) 0.927s 7 1.10x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 4.043s (+0.7%) 4.725s (+6.5% 🔺) 0.681s 7 1.16x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 5.735s (-15.0% 🟢) 6.215s (-17.3% 🟢) 0.480s 5 1.65x
💻 Local Nitro 7.425s (+5.9% 🔺) 8.026s (+6.7% 🔺) 0.601s 4 2.13x
💻 Local Express 7.447s (-2.2%) 8.018s (~) 0.571s 4 2.14x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 9.666s (-1.4%) 10.346s (~) 0.680s 3 2.78x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.922s (+6.1% 🔺) 3.949s (+1.8%) 1.026s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.003s (+16.0% 🔺) 3.745s (+8.2% 🔺) 0.742s 9 1.03x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.304s (+7.9% 🔺) 4.237s (-6.5% 🟢) 0.932s 8 1.13x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.273s (+2.8%) 2.006s (~) 0.733s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.358s (~) 2.010s (~) 0.652s 15 1.07x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.368s (-3.2%) 2.006s (~) 0.638s 15 1.07x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.375s (+1.5%) 2.011s (~) 0.636s 15 1.08x
💻 Local Express 1.419s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.586s 15 1.11x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.425s (+4.5%) 2.011s (~) 0.587s 15 1.12x
💻 Local Nitro 1.437s (+1.2%) 2.006s (~) 0.568s 15 1.13x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 2.168s (+1.9%) 3.007s (~) 0.838s 10 1.70x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.996s (-4.0%) 2.922s (-14.3% 🟢) 0.926s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.021s (-14.4% 🟢) 3.289s (-14.1% 🟢) 1.268s 10 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.059s (-19.7% 🟢) 3.294s (-12.3% 🟢) 1.235s 10 1.03x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.963s (+2.0%) 2.396s (-4.6%) 0.433s 13 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.039s (+1.5%) 2.681s (+3.2%) 0.642s 12 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.118s (+8.8% 🔺) 2.740s (+9.0% 🔺) 0.622s 11 1.08x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.412s (-6.6% 🟢) 2.917s (-3.0%) 0.505s 11 1.23x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.527s (+1.8%) 3.008s (~) 0.481s 10 1.29x
💻 Local Nitro 2.660s (+0.7%) 3.008s (~) 0.347s 10 1.36x
💻 Local Express 2.666s (-2.9%) 3.007s (~) 0.341s 10 1.36x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 4.658s (-2.6%) 5.175s (~) 0.517s 6 2.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.156s (-6.8% 🟢) 2.906s (-15.5% 🟢) 0.750s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.275s (-13.0% 🟢) 3.470s (-5.2% 🟢) 1.195s 9 1.06x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.571s (~) 3.824s (+9.6% 🔺) 1.253s 8 1.19x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.280s (-2.5%) 4.020s (+3.2%) 0.740s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.335s (-7.1% 🟢) 4.306s (-3.3%) 0.971s 7 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.738s (-2.8%) 4.596s (+4.5%) 0.858s 7 1.14x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 4.106s (+2.4%) 5.011s (+9.4% 🔺) 0.905s 6 1.25x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 6.036s (-11.1% 🟢) 6.417s (-14.6% 🟢) 0.381s 5 1.84x
💻 Local Express 7.848s (-3.2%) 8.023s (-11.1% 🟢) 0.175s 4 2.39x
💻 Local Nitro 8.005s (+4.8%) 8.273s (+3.1%) 0.268s 4 2.44x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 9.901s (-1.2%) 10.347s (-3.2%) 0.445s 3 3.02x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.653s (-17.4% 🟢) 3.437s (-20.5% 🟢) 0.784s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.799s (-27.5% 🟢) 3.585s (-29.6% 🟢) 0.786s 9 1.05x
▲ Vercel Express 2.862s (-7.4% 🟢) 3.688s (-18.0% 🟢) 0.826s 9 1.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.116s (-21.1% 🟢) 1.001s (~) 0.009s (-11.2% 🟢) 1.015s (~) 0.899s 10 1.00x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.159s (+7.1% 🔺) 1.000s (~) 0.001s (+7.7% 🔺) 1.008s (~) 0.849s 10 1.37x
💻 Local Express 0.170s (-3.4%) 1.002s (~) 0.011s (-3.4%) 1.017s (~) 0.847s 10 1.46x
💻 Local Nitro 0.174s (+3.8%) 1.002s (~) 0.011s (+6.5% 🔺) 1.017s (~) 0.843s 10 1.50x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.175s (-4.8%) 1.000s (~) 0.002s (+21.4% 🔺) 1.012s (~) 0.837s 10 1.51x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.211s (+10.5% 🔺) 0.996s (+0.6%) 0.002s (+17.6% 🔺) 1.014s (~) 0.803s 10 1.82x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.212s (+16.2% 🔺) 0.992s (~) 0.002s (+41.7% 🔺) 1.012s (~) 0.800s 10 1.82x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 0.488s (-0.7%) 0.962s (~) 0.002s (~) 1.009s (~) 0.521s 10 4.20x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.415s (-6.1% 🟢) 1.620s (-7.3% 🟢) 0.092s (-70.6% 🟢) 2.089s (-18.9% 🟢) 0.674s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 1.446s (+10.0% 🔺) 1.750s (+3.3%) 0.090s (-32.1% 🟢) 2.306s (+5.3% 🔺) 0.860s 10 1.02x
▲ Vercel Express 1.460s (+2.0%) 1.638s (-12.5% 🟢) 0.101s (-62.7% 🟢) 2.209s (-15.3% 🟢) 0.750s 10 1.03x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 11/12
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 9/12
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 5/12
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 6/12
Next.js (Turbopack) 💻 Local 5/12
Nitro 💻 Local 6/12
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Feb 24, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 523 0 49 572
✅ 💻 Local Development 556 0 68 624
✅ 📦 Local Production 556 0 68 624
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 556 0 68 624
✅ 🪟 Windows 49 0 3 52
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 111 45 9 165
✅ 📋 Other 135 0 21 156
Total 2486 45 286 2817

❌ Failed Tests

🌍 Community Worlds (45 failed)

turso (45 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow
  • addTenWorkflow
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow
  • promiseRaceWorkflow
  • promiseAnyWorkflow
  • hookWorkflow
  • webhookWorkflow
  • sleepingWorkflow
  • parallelSleepWorkflow
  • nullByteWorkflow
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow
  • fetchWorkflow
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling retry behavior workflow completes despite transient 5xx on step_completed
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars)
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply()
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 47 0 5
✅ example 47 0 5
✅ express 47 0 5
✅ fastify 47 0 5
✅ hono 47 0 5
✅ nextjs-turbopack 50 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 50 0 2
✅ nitro 47 0 5
✅ nuxt 47 0 5
✅ sveltekit 47 0 5
✅ vite 47 0 5
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 49 0 3
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 3 0 0
✅ mongodb 49 0 3
✅ redis-dev 3 0 0
✅ redis 49 0 3
✅ turso-dev 3 0 0
❌ turso 4 45 3
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 45 0 7
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 45 0 7
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 45 0 7

📋 View full workflow run

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@TooTallNate TooTallNate marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2026 07:23
@TooTallNate TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code owner February 24, 2026 07:23
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 24, 2026 07:23
@TooTallNate TooTallNate review requested due to automatic review settings February 24, 2026 07:23
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@karthikscale3 karthikscale3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment thread packages/core/src/runtime/start.ts
@TooTallNate TooTallNate merged commit 70223a9 into main Feb 24, 2026
169 of 171 checks passed
@TooTallNate TooTallNate deleted the 02-23-don_t_enforce_client-side_generated_runid_in_start_for_v1compat_ branch February 24, 2026 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants