Merged
Conversation
- repo-assist trigger was missing the 👀 (eyes) reaction that the workflow frontmatter declares alongside /repo-assist and the schedule - catalog.md repository-layout comment still read "(stub until scope-lock)" after the catalog was populated with 7 entries in PR #7 - Prerequisites section for fork maintainers didn't mention GitHub Discussions must be enabled; daily-plan (announcements category) and weekly-research (ideas category) both require it Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
verkyyi
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Three small inaccuracies found by cross-referencing README.md against the actual workflow
.mdsource files:1.
repo-assistmissing👀 reactiontriggerrepo-assist.mdfrontmatter declares four triggers:schedule: every 12h,workflow_dispatch,slash_command: repo-assist, andreaction: "eyes". The README table only listed the first two meaningful ones (Every 12 h + /repo-assist), silently dropping the👀reaction path that lets maintainers trigger an on-demand run by reacting to any issue or PR.2.
catalog.mdlayout comment was staleThe repository layout section described
catalog.mdas(stub until scope-lock). The catalog was populated with 7 entries in PR #7, and the Publishing checklist in the same file already acknowledges this (~~Fill in catalog.md~~ — catalog populated with 7 entries). The layout comment was never updated to match.3. Missing GitHub Discussions prerequisite
daily-plan.mdusessafe-outputs: create-discussion: category: "announcements"andweekly-research.mdusescategory: "ideas". A fork maintainer who enables these workflows without GitHub Discussions turned on will see them fail silently. The Prerequisites section now calls this out explicitly.All three changes are README.md only — no skill logic, no lock files, no catalog entries touched.