fix(lib): respect rollupOptions.input in lib mode#10116
Merged
patak-dev merged 1 commit intovitejs:mainfrom Sep 19, 2022
Merged
fix(lib): respect rollupOptions.input in lib mode#10116patak-dev merged 1 commit intovitejs:mainfrom
rollupOptions.input in lib mode#10116patak-dev merged 1 commit intovitejs:mainfrom
Conversation
patak-dev
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2022
9 tasks
sapphi-red
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2022
|
This PR breaks the |
Member
|
@DrJume would you create a new issue so we can properly track the regression? |
9 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #9086
Description
#7275 introduced a regression which caused
rollupOptions.inputto be ignored in library mode. Before that, the de facto behaviour in library mode isrollupOptions.inputoverwritinglib.entry. This PR tweaks the config merging behaviour so thatrollupOptions.inputis only ignored in SSR mode.Additional context
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following
fixes #123).