docs(en): merge docs-cn/sync-docs into docs-cn/dev @ ec964f36#965
docs(en): merge docs-cn/sync-docs into docs-cn/dev @ ec964f36#965docschina-bot wants to merge 9 commits intodevfrom
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Ari Perkkiö <ari.perkkio@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
❌ Deploy Preview for cn-vitest failed.
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6ec637b9a3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| @@ -1,30 +1,59 @@ | |||
| <<<<<<< HEAD | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This commit leaves unresolved merge markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>) in published Markdown; this file begins with <<<<<<< HEAD, and a repo scan (git grep -n '<<<<<<<' d3597e1ed45bbe7837e567033cfa131400710b89) finds many more occurrences across api/, config/, and guide/. In these contexts the docs will render raw conflict text and mixed duplicate sections (here it also disrupts block structure), so users will see visibly broken documentation until conflicts are resolved.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
6 participants
此 PR 自动生成。
合并 vitest-dev/docs-cn 的修改至本仓库（@ ec964f3）
以下文件存在冲突，可能需要重新翻译：
请解决所有冲突后提交到此 pull request，可直接在 Github 修改、切换到 sync-ec964f36-1 分支进行修改或者使用 Github Desktop 拉取此 pr 修改并提交。
禁止使用 Squash Merge 来合并此 Pull Request！
使用该操作会导致上游仓库的内容丢失，并致使下一次合并产生冲突。