Skip to content

fix: mistyped option name(--no-parallelism)#4831

Merged
AriPerkkio merged 1 commit intovitest-dev:mainfrom
bonyuta0204:fix/no-parallelism-suggestion
Dec 31, 2023
Merged

fix: mistyped option name(--no-parallelism)#4831
AriPerkkio merged 1 commit intovitest-dev:mainfrom
bonyuta0204:fix/no-parallelism-suggestion

Conversation

@bonyuta0204
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bonyuta0204 bonyuta0204 commented Dec 31, 2023

Description

In certain sections of the documentation and error messages, the option --no-file-parallelism is incorrectly referred to as --no-parallelism.
This Pull Request corrects these inconsistencies to ensure that the correct option name, --no-file-parallelism, is used throughout.

Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following:

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. If the feature is substantial or introduces breaking changes without a discussion, PR might be closed.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.
  • Please, don't make changes to pnpm-lock.yaml unless you introduce a new test example.

Tests

  • Run the tests with pnpm test:ci.

Documentation

  • If you introduce new functionality, document it. You can run documentation with pnpm run docs command.

Changesets

  • Changes in changelog are generated from PR name. Please, make sure that it explains your changes in an understandable manner. Please, prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, perf:, docs:, or chore:.

Loading
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

incorrect error message when running vitest only with --inspect-brk option

2 participants