fix: use idiomatic Go boolean check in store_redis.go

[HarshitPal25]

Description:
What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
Replaces if ok == false with if !ok in store_redis.go. The Go Code Review Comments wiki and golint/revive linters recommend against comparing boolean values to true/false explicitly. The idiomatic Go form uses the negation operator directly.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[volcano-sh-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign yaozengzeng for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request refactors a boolean comparison in pkg/store/store_redis.go to use the more idiomatic !ok syntax. I have no feedback to provide as there were no review comments.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR performs a small cleanup in the Redis store implementation by switching a boolean comparison to idiomatic Go (if !ok) in redisStore.UpdateSandbox, aligning with common Go linting guidance.

Changes:

• Replace if ok == false with if !ok in pkg/store/store_redis.go.

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 47.74%. Comparing base (524e55e) to head (a927d93).
⚠️ Report is 41 commits behind head on main.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #316      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   47.57%   47.74%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          30       30              
  Lines        2819     2855      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits         1341     1363      +22     
- Misses       1338     1344       +6     
- Partials      140      148       +8     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	47.74% <100.00%> (+0.17%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.