原文：
For our approach, we followed the experiment
setting D in the previous section, using the same
training and development data sets for the 10 seen
types, but targeted all 1,194 event types in our
new event ontology, instead of just the 33 ACE
event types.
如果是的话，能不能提供下1161种�事件类型名，我们也在做相关的对比实验，想引用对比下
谢谢
原文：
For our approach, we followed the experiment
setting D in the previous section, using the same
training and development data sets for the 10 seen
types, but targeted all 1,194 event types in our
new event ontology, instead of just the 33 ACE
event types.
如果是的话，能不能提供下1161种�事件类型名，我们也在做相关的对比实验，想引用对比下
谢谢