Skip to content

Comments

[WPB-8716] chore: bump lithium without legacy javax deps.#145

Merged
dkovacevic merged 3 commits intostagingfrom
chore/bump-lithium
Apr 15, 2024
Merged

[WPB-8716] chore: bump lithium without legacy javax deps.#145
dkovacevic merged 3 commits intostagingfrom
chore/bump-lithium

Conversation

@yamilmedina
Copy link
Collaborator


PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

  • The PR Title

    • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
    • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
    • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³
  • The PR Description

    • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

What's new in this PR?

Issues

Bump to latest lithium

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

  • Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

  • If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

References
  1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
  2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
  3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

@yamilmedina yamilmedina requested a review from dkovacevic March 14, 2024 10:35
@yamilmedina yamilmedina self-assigned this Mar 14, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 14, 2024

Test Results

8 tests   7 ✔️  7s ⏱️
4 suites  1 💤
4 files    0

Results for commit 5c3a217.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@dkovacevic dkovacevic merged commit ae6f0a4 into staging Apr 15, 2024
@dkovacevic dkovacevic deleted the chore/bump-lithium branch April 15, 2024 11:03
@b1pb1p b1pb1p changed the title chore: bump lithium without legacy javax deps. [WPB-8716] chore: bump lithium without legacy javax deps. Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants