Skip to content

Conversation

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor

@octo-sts octo-sts bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added request-version-update request for a newer version of a package automated pr python-3.10 P0 This label indicates our scanning found CRITICAL CVEs for these packages. labels Oct 9, 2025
@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Oct 9, 2025

🩹 Build Failed: Patch Application Failed

Failed to run command "/bin/sh -c 'set -e \n[ -d '''/home/build''' ] || mkdir -p '''/home/build'''
cd '''/home/build'''
series=''''
if [ -z $series ]; then
if [ -n '''gh-118224.patch gh-127301.patch gh-135462.patch''' ]; then
series=$(mktemp)
echo '''gh-118224.patch gh-127301.patch gh-135462.patch''' | awk '''{ for(i = 1; i <= NF; i++) { print $i; } }''' >$series
else
echo "ERROR: Neither patches or series was set."
exit 1
fi
fi
grep -v -E '''^(#|$)''' $series | (while read patchfile; do
patch '''-p1''' --fuzz=2 --verbose <$patchfile
done)

exit 0'": Process exited with status 1

Build Details

Category Details
Build System melange
Failure Point patch application step during package pipeline

Root Cause Analysis 🔍

Multiple patches failed to apply properly, specifically the gh-135462.patch which was detected as already applied or reversed, causing the patch process to fail with exit status 1. The patch command encountered conflicts where 3 out of 3 hunks were ignored for Lib/html/parser.py and 4 out of 4 hunks were ignored for Lib/test/test_htmlparser.py, creating reject files.


Was this comment helpful? Please use 👍 or 👎 reactions on this comment.

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR label Oct 9, 2025
@OddBloke OddBloke self-assigned this Oct 9, 2025
@OddBloke OddBloke force-pushed the wolfictl-12c23aea-44f9-442d-af52-e1cd4e3433ec branch from f88a649 to 0e8c319 Compare October 9, 2025 17:18
wolfi-bot and others added 2 commits October 9, 2025 13:32
Signed-off-by: wolfi-bot <121097084+wolfi-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@OddBloke OddBloke force-pushed the wolfictl-12c23aea-44f9-442d-af52-e1cd4e3433ec branch from 0e8c319 to 822778b Compare October 9, 2025 17:32
@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. label Oct 9, 2025
@OddBloke OddBloke requested a review from a team October 9, 2025 17:47
@OddBloke
Copy link
Member

OddBloke commented Oct 9, 2025

The CVE being detected is fixed by this release: our scanner presumably hasn't caught up yet, as the fix landed yesterday and the release was today.

@OddBloke OddBloke merged commit 749c6d6 into main Oct 9, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
@OddBloke OddBloke deleted the wolfictl-12c23aea-44f9-442d-af52-e1cd4e3433ec branch October 9, 2025 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR automated pr bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. manual/review-needed P0 This label indicates our scanning found CRITICAL CVEs for these packages. python-3.10 request-version-update request for a newer version of a package

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants