Record accuracy sweep results for bilateral#1406
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request |
Co-authored-by: brendancol <433221+brendancol@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Records accuracy sweep results for the
bilateralmodule in.claude/sweep-accuracy-state.csv. No issues found.Audit covered all five accuracy categories across numpy, cupy, dask+numpy, and dask+cupy backends:
sqrt(np.finfo(float64).tiny)lower bound; oversize sigma clamped tomax(rows, cols).w_sum > 0.0guard prevents division by zero.map_overlapdepth equals kernel radius. CUDA bounds use strict<. Loop bounds are symmetric and inclusive ofy+radius.Test plan
xrspatial/bilateral.py,xrspatial/utils.py,xrspatial/tests/general_checks.py,xrspatial/tests/test_bilateral.py