Skip to content

Status should not be required in stacks#211

Merged
arjunrn merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
status-not-required
Mar 17, 2020
Merged

Status should not be required in stacks#211
arjunrn merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
status-not-required

Conversation

@mikkeloscar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Avoid having Status required as it breaks when deploying a resource without the status defined as the stackset controller does when initially creating stacks.

Signed-off-by: Mikkel Oscar Lyderik Larsen <mikkel.larsen@zalando.de>
@mikkeloscar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

👍

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1500

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 68.747%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1497: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1575
Relevant Lines: 2291

💛 - Coveralls

@arjunrn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

arjunrn commented Mar 17, 2020

👍

@arjunrn arjunrn merged commit 93d0a52 into master Mar 17, 2020
@arjunrn arjunrn deleted the status-not-required branch March 17, 2020 14:20
thilp added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2020
Just like in #211 for Stack, I don't think StackSet.status should be required on creation.
mikkeloscar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2020
Just like in #211 for Stack, I don't think StackSet.status should be required on creation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants