Skip to content

Conversation

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Also tidy release notes

xref: #1285 (comment)

cc @joshmoore @madsbk


TODO:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/tutorial.rst
  • Changes documented in docs/release.rst
  • GitHub Actions have all passed
  • Test coverage is 100% (Codecov passes)

Also tidy release notes
@jakirkham jakirkham mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2023
5 tasks
@joshmoore
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @jakirkham! 🙏🏽 but the format looks a bit borked:

Screenshot 2023-01-19 at 20 36 44

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Unfortunately that entry already has issues

Tried to fix some of them, but can back them out if that is distracting (it is tangential to this PR)

Screen Shot 2023-01-19 at 11 41 46 AM

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member

Unfortunately that entry already has issues

Sorry. I just saw that myself. Didn't mean to offload it on you.

docs/release.rst Outdated
Comment on lines 25 to 27
- storage transformers

- ``get_partial_values`` and ``set_partial_values``
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So this looks ok in reStructuredText, but Sphinx seems to render it wacky. In any event at least this is consistent with what we do elsewhere

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

This is probably as good as we can get

Screen Shot 2023-01-19 at 12 39 14 PM

https://zarr--1325.org.readthedocs.build/en/1325/release.html

@jakirkham jakirkham requested a review from joshmoore January 19, 2023 20:53
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

@joshmoore, could you please review when you have a chance?

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member

Screenshot 2023-01-20 at 12 13 37

Going to call this good. Merging. (@jstriebel can hit us on the head if he wants)

@jakirkham jakirkham merged commit 1793da0 into zarr-developers:main Jan 20, 2023
@jakirkham jakirkham deleted the rel_note_fs_bytes branch January 20, 2023 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants