Skip to content

fix: revert Bitcoin inbound if there no memo provided by user#3752

Merged
morde08 merged 2 commits intorelease/v29from
fix-revert-btc-inbound-if-no-memo-provided
Mar 24, 2025
Merged

fix: revert Bitcoin inbound if there no memo provided by user#3752
morde08 merged 2 commits intorelease/v29from
fix-revert-btc-inbound-if-no-memo-provided

Conversation

@ws4charlie
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The v29 is able to revert Bitcoin deposits that carry incorrectly formatted memo (e.g., invalid receiver address), but it cannot properly revert deposits that carry no memo at all, which are supposed be reverted.

This fix will allow no-memo deposits to be able to go through ZetaChain and get funds reverted.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Tested CCTX in localnet
  • Tested in development environment
  • Go unit tests
  • Go integration tests
  • Tested via GitHub Actions

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

🗂️ Base branches to auto review (1)
  • develop

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.43%. Comparing base (308fca1) to head (cb636b5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on release/v29.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release/v29    #3752      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        64.44%   64.43%   -0.01%     
===============================================
  Files              469      469              
  Lines            32891    32899       +8     
===============================================
+ Hits             21195    21199       +4     
- Misses           10727    10731       +4     
  Partials           969      969              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/event.go 93.61% <100.00%> (+0.28%) ⬆️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/witness.go 83.73% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ws4charlie ws4charlie marked this pull request as ready for review March 24, 2025 20:23
@ws4charlie ws4charlie requested a review from a team as a code owner March 24, 2025 20:23
@lumtis lumtis added the no-changelog Skip changelog CI check label Mar 24, 2025
// make a deposit without memo
utxos := r.ListDeployerUTXOs()
txHash, err := r.SendToTSSFromDeployerWithMemo(0.1, utxos[:1], []byte{})
txHash, err := r.SendToTSSFromDeployerWithMemo(0.1, utxos[:1], nil)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a note for the develop PR: Let's cover for non existant and empty memo

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah. Both non existant and empty memo are covered in here.

@morde08 morde08 merged commit 58e2c53 into release/v29 Mar 24, 2025
46 of 47 checks passed
@morde08 morde08 deleted the fix-revert-btc-inbound-if-no-memo-provided branch March 24, 2025 21:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no-changelog Skip changelog CI check

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants