More stage1 test coverage#15879
Conversation
andrewrk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great work. You mind doing one last rebase and then I'll mark this as auto-merge?
|
I'm pretty sure I didn't change anything that would cause this new failure that previously didn't happen: Pretty sure all I did was resolve the conflict and rebase on master/the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, I did not take as close a look at the new test cases last time as I should have.
Please use panics instead of illegal behavior (i.e. assert) so that the tests are meaningful in safety-off optimization modes as well.
Also please use behavior tests where possible instead of run test cases.
|
Oh, that is very true. I must've just taken that idea from other tests without thinking about it enough. It's also very good to know that behavior tests are in fact preferable. |
Interesting. This has also not previously happened before the rebase. Anyway, AFAIU the zig downloads are broken right now so I'm going to wait till I can get the latest master from the download page. |
|
I'm going to try limiting tests that I think might have to do with the failure to linux-x86_64 for now. |
Vectors are a likely culprit: #13782 |
|
Thanks! That helps a lot. |
No description provided.