codegen: fix field offsets in packed structs#17375
Merged
andrewrk merged 2 commits intoziglang:masterfrom Oct 3, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
seems like this might also address #14632? |
* add nested packed struct/union behavior tests * use ptr_info.packed_offset rather than trying to duplicate the logic from Sema.structFieldPtrByIndex() * use the container_ptr_info.packed_offset to account for non-aligned nested structs. * dedup type.packedStructFieldBitOffset() and module.structPackedFieldBitOffset()
Contributor
Author
now it does... |
Member
|
Thanks for refreshing the PR, I'll have a look at this tomorrow 👍 |
Member
|
This code looks great and thank you for for the additional test coverage. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
resolves #16615 and #16621 (probably, there's no reproducer)
resolves #16748
resolves #14632
it's an other attempt from #16657