Improve argument rules#6100
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
yuumasato
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Isn't the oval_argument_file macro very similar to line_in_file macro?
Yes, it is similar. But also it is different. The |
yuumasato
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, it is similar. But also it is different. The
line_in_fileis tailored for a single value per line.
Thanks for clarifying the differences.
But, if you can see a way to do the same using
line_in_file, please give me an example.
I think multi_value=true can help.
https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/blob/master/shared/macros-oval.jinja#L17
It is used by oval_grub_config macro for example.
https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/blob/master/shared/macros-oval.jinja#L327
And actually, all BLS related templates could leverage |
|
Changes identified: Recommended tests to execute: |
The only rule that use it does it like this The resulting OVAL is: <ind:textfilecontent54_object id="oval:ssg-obj_grub2_nousb_argument:obj:1" version="1">
<ind:filepath>/etc/default/grub</ind:filepath>
<ind:pattern operation="pattern match">^[ \t]*GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=([^#]*).*$</ind:pattern>
<ind:instance operation="greater than or equal" datatype="int">1</ind:instance>
</ind:textfilecontent54_object>
<ind:textfilecontent54_state id="oval:ssg-state_grub2_nousb_argument:ste:1" version="1">
<ind:subexpression datatype="string" operation="pattern match">^.*\bnousb\b.*$</ind:subexpression>
</ind:textfilecontent54_state> |
BLS-compatible bootloader is not nesesary the GRUB, hence |
My point was to illustrate usage of macro |
My bad, you are correct in the BLS assessment. |
I got it. But still it is more tailored to check for rather than for While I actually was able to imagine some regexes for |
|
@matejak Here you are, |
|
@JAORMX Can you test it, please? |
|
Ah, dammit, conflicts |
and use it as custom Jinja filter and across the code for ID sanitizing and regular expression escaping unification. Also document custom filters in the Developer's Guide.
…est' and high-level 'oval_argument_in_file' macros And use them to re-factor 'zipl_bls_entries_option', 'bls_entries_option' and 'coreos_kernel_option' templates.
39e33d7 to
e81f130
Compare
|
/test e2e-aws-rhcos4-moderate |
|
@evgenyz this worked for me! /lgtm |
I guess that you meant whether it is OK that the OVAL title is determined by the rule's XCCDF title, as that's what |
|
@yuumasato How do you like it? Are the ZIPL changes OK from your point of view? |
yuumasato
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While I actually was able to imagine some regexes for
oval_check_config_fileto use it for the later case, I strongly believe that it would be an abusive usage of that (already very complex) macro. Let's have a new oneoval_argument_in_fileand tailor it for the second case.
Alright.
Improvement of #6088.
More info pending.