[test/integration] Delete docker listener test#35657
Merged
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 3 commits intomainfrom Apr 1, 2025
Merged
[test/integration] Delete docker listener test#35657dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 3 commits intomainfrom
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 3 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
davidor
added
changelog/no-changelog
davidor
added
qa/done
Contributor
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Contributor
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=60520769 --os-family=ubuntuNote: This applies to commit e8c4b5d |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 39ee01b Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +1.47 | [-1.35, +4.30] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.39 | [+1.33, +1.45] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +1.32 | [+1.15, +1.48] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | +0.94 | [+0.88, +1.00] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.81 | [+0.75, +0.88] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.41 | [-0.35, +1.18] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.32 | [+0.22, +0.41] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | +0.15 | [+0.01, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.09 | [-0.70, +0.88] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.69, +0.73] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.62, +0.64] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.74, +0.76] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.80, +0.79] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.83, +0.79] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.29, +0.24] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.51, +0.43] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | -0.33 | [-0.49, -0.17] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_traces | memory utilization | -1.74 | [-2.13, -1.35] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -3.67 | [-4.49, -2.85] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
Contributor
Static quality checks ✅Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
clamoriniere
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2025
Member
Author
|
/merge |
|
View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
The expected merge time in
|
dd-mergequeue
Bot
deleted the
davidor/contp-644-remove-old-docker-listener-test
branch
Contributor
|
The backport to To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal: # Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-6.53.x 6.53.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-6.53.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-35657-to-6.53.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 ca608a0e8c6a228c4bc54fee9510011b6935229b
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-35657-to-6.53.x
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-6.53.xThen, create a pull request where the |
davidor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2025
(cherry picked from commit ca608a0)
ogaca-dd
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2025
Contributor
|
The backport to To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal: # Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-7.64.x 7.64.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-7.64.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-35657-to-7.64.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 ca608a0e8c6a228c4bc54fee9510011b6935229b
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-35657-to-7.64.x
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-7.64.xThen, create a pull request where the |
agent-platform-auto-pr Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2025
(cherry picked from commit ca608a0)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This PR removes an old integration test as part of the ongoing effort to migrate legacy tests to the new framework.
I think that the deleted test can be safely removed because its coverage is now redundant.
More specifically, the deleted test:
The ECS tests that use the new framework (https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/blob/main/test/new-e2e/tests/containers/ecs_test.go) test the full pipeline, including metrics for autodiscovery checks, without directly instantiating components, so they're more complete.
The removed test also included a check for excluded containers. While we already have some coverage for that, it wasn’t in the autodiscovery listeners, so I added a test to cover that scenario for completeness.
Describe how you validated your changes
Tests in CI should pass.