Closed
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks, well spotted |
jajhall
approved these changes
May 5, 2025
Member
jajhall
left a comment
jajhall
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This works fine - in that num_objective_section = 0 doesn't seem to cause any downstream issues. Also tested with .lp file beginning
Maximize
Subject to
as well as one beginning
Subject to
Member
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a model has empty objective (e.g. generated in https://docs.gurobi.com/projects/examples/en/current/examples/python/sudoku.html ), it might not be as garbage as we suspect.