change glc -> ocn export fields to be glc->rof#100
change glc -> ocn export fields to be glc->rof#100Katetc merged 27 commits intoESCOMP:cismwrap_to_rof_branchfrom
Conversation
updates for pes and testlist for noresm
Change CISM_USE_ICESHEET to GLC_USE_ICESHEET
…2_1_99 update to cismwrap_2_1_99
update of noresm cism_wrapper to cismwrap_2_1_99
|
@Katetc - not sure how we want to proceed with this - including the review. |
|
@Katetc Do you want to review this - I need it for cesm3_0_alpha02a. |
Yes, I would like to. Thanks! |
Katetc
left a comment
Katetc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we could put the surface fields outside of the no-evolve check, then I would be very happy merging this PR. If not, I'd like to chat about that a bit. Thanks Mariana!
| call fldlist_add(fldsToGlc_num, fldsToGlc, field_in_tsrf) | ||
| call fldlist_add(fldsToGlc_num, fldsToGlc, field_in_qice) | ||
| call fldlist_add(fldsToGlc_num, fldsToGlc, field_in_so_t_depth, ungridded_lbound=1, ungridded_ubound=nlev_import) | ||
| call fldlist_add(fldsToGlc_num, fldsToGlc, field_in_so_s_depth, ungridded_lbound=1, ungridded_ubound=nlev_import) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, I think it would make a lot of sense for these ocean-depth fields to be inside of an only "cism evolving" check. But the 2D temperature and surface mass balance should be advertised for both cases.
|
Merged to a temporary branch where I can work out the external tags and write up the ChangeLog before merging to Main. Thanks Mariana! |
3 participants
This PR does the following