Skip to content

rtm1_0_87: Put instantaneous and non-inst. fields on separate history files#61

Merged
slevis-lmwg merged 11 commits intoESCOMP:masterfrom
slevis-lmwg:sep_hXi_hXa_tapes_iss52
Jul 4, 2025
Merged

rtm1_0_87: Put instantaneous and non-inst. fields on separate history files#61
slevis-lmwg merged 11 commits intoESCOMP:masterfrom
slevis-lmwg:sep_hXi_hXa_tapes_iss52

Conversation

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Contributor

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg commented Jul 1, 2025

This is the RTM counterpart to ESCOMP/MOSART#117 and ESCOMP/CTSM#2445.

Resolves #32 (my branch name should have referenced issue #32 instead of 52)

PASS ./run_sys_tests -s rtm --skip-generate --skip-compare on derecho and izumi

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg self-assigned this Jul 1, 2025
@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg requested a review from ekluzek July 1, 2025 18:02
@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ekluzek this is ready for review/approval. The changes to rtm and mosart will look very similar to what you reviewed in ESCOMP/CTSM#2445

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Contributor Author

I changed one of the ERS tests to ERP as an additional sanity check:
ERP_D_Ld5.f09_f09_mg17.I1850Clm60SpNoAnthro.derecho_intel.rtm-rtmOnFloodOnEffvelOn

Copy link
Contributor

@ekluzek ekluzek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is largely the same as what's going on in CTSM. And there's a lot of detailed work here that I'm glad you were able to do. So good job in getting it done.

I have a couple comments, and questions, but hitting approve so you don't have to wait on me.

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Contributor Author

slevis-lmwg commented Jul 3, 2025

  • finalize and push ChangeLog

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg merged commit dd45b88 into ESCOMP:master Jul 4, 2025
@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg deleted the sep_hXi_hXa_tapes_iss52 branch July 4, 2025 00:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rtm1_0_87: Put instantaneous and non-inst. fields on separate history files

2 participants