fix: all workspace names are bolded in workspace switcher.

[Krishna2323]

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #36140
PROPOSAL: #37577 (comment)

Tests

1. Open workspace switcher and verify only the workspace with unread data is bolded

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

1. Open workspace switcher and verify only the workspace with unread data is bolded

QA Steps

1. Open workspace switcher and verify only the workspace with unread data is bolded

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

android_native.mp4

Android: mWeb Chrome

android_chrome.mp4

iOS: Native

ios_native.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

ios_safari.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

web_chrome.mp4

MacOS: Desktop

desktop_app.mp4

[melvin-bot]

@hoangzinh Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[hoangzinh]

Please let me know when the PR is ready for review @Krishna2323

[Krishna2323]

@hoangzinh, ready for review, adding android recording in few minutes

[hoangzinh]

@Krishna2323 I realize that we haven't fixed the issue yet. When I type a valid search term, it doesn't highlight on the first item in the list but the "All" option.

[Krishna2323]

@hoangzinh, Hmmm, seems like the switcher component has changed, now it also includes Everything in selection list. I will update accordingly.

[hoangzinh]

We probably confirm expectations again in the issue with BZ and the internal engineer if we're unsure

[Krishna2323]

@rlinoz, we are totally lost here :(, could you please help?

Here is the timeline from the start of the assignment:

• The original issue was the focus on the second item when searching in the workspace switcher. I made changes in OptionsSelector and got stuck due to a minor regression caused by a PR.
• Then we decided to migrate the OptionsSelector to SelectionList, and I completed the migration in the same PR. Unfortunately, another PR was also working on the migration, and they merged it before us.
• Then we decided to fix these two issues, but again, there was some PR that addressed the fixes and got merged, leaving us with no changes.

Now we have another issue related to the original problem (focus on the second item when searching in the workspace switcher). Since we now have everything section in the selection list, when the search term changes, only the everything section is focused, no matter what the search term is. In my opinion, we should focus on the first matching search option, like it was before the change.

Please let us know if we are good to go. Changes are done, and only recordings are left. I guess no other PR is working on this issue.

Issue

workspace_switcher_search_focus_bug.mp4

After fix

web_chrome.mp4

cc: @hoangzinh

[hoangzinh]

You can bring this question to the GH issue so we can have BZ member opinions there to decide the expected result again.

[Krishna2323]

The other issues has been fixed. Will raise new for other issue PR when #36140 gets unheld.