Prevent self approvals

[lakchote]

Explanation of Change

Implement the "Prevent Self-Approvals" mechanism in NewDot.

Video test

Screen.Recording.2025-01-27.at.09.53.31.mov

Fixed Issues

$ #53799

Tests

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Prerequisites:

• a Control workspace
• 3 members (a policy owner which we'll call user A, an admin which we'll call user B, an employee)

1. Basic Flow (No self approvers)

1. Sign in as User A (the workspace owner).
2. Go to Settings > Workspaces > Workflows > Rules.
3. Enable approvals if not already enabled (so that “Prevent Self Approvals” can be toggled).
4. In the Rules section, toggle Prevent Self Approvals.

Expected result:
The toggle should turn on without any modal or warnings (because no one is self-approving in this scenario).

2. Verify Modal Trigger When a Member is Their Own Approver

1. Sign in as User A (workspace owner).
2. Under Workflows > Create a Rule so that User B is set as their own approver.
3. Attempt to toggle Prevent Self Approvals ON.

Expected result: a modal appears because User B is self-approving.
This modal says “Any members currently approving their own expenses will be removed and replaced with the default approver for this workspace ({defaultWorkspaceOwnerEmail}).".
{defaultWorkspaceOwnerEmail} should be replaced by the default workspace approver/owner.
6. Confirm the modal, the toggle should be ON.
7. Go to Workflows.

Expected results:
The workflow where user B was self approving should have been removed.
The workflow that remains should be the default one where all workspace members submits to the workspace approver.

3. Workspace with several members become a workspace with only one member

Prerequisite: having a workspace with Prevent self approvals enabled

1. Go to the Workspace's Members page
2. Remove several members so that ONLY one member remain (the workspace owner)
3. Go to the Rules section
4. Verify Prevent self approvals got disabled
5. Verify you see a system message in the #admins room of that workspace, that says Prevent self approvals got disabled

4. Check we can't enable the feature if there's only one user (the workspace owner)

1. As an admin (user A), create a Control policy where there are no other members
2. Go to Rules
3. Verify you can't toggle on the feature and you see the following message:
   

5. Check Spanish Translations

1. Switch the app's language to Spanish.
2. Repeat scenario 2 and ensure that this message is translated in Spanish:

“Any members currently approving their own expenses will be removed and replaced with the default approver for this workspace ({defaultWorkspaceOwnerEmail})."

Offline tests

1. Go to Settings > Troubleshoot > Force offline
2. Perform the same steps as in the video test above
3. You should have the same expected results
4. Go back online
5. The results should stay the same

QA Steps

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Same as in tests

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2025-01-27.at.09.53.31.mov

MacOS: Desktop

[lakchote]

Spanish translation review requested here.

[github-actions]

🚧 @lakchote has triggered a test build. You can view the workflow run here.

[melvin-bot]

@dannymcclain @alitoshmatov One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[lakchote]

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

@trjExpensify @JmillsExpensify @dannymcclain you can test it out here 👆

[trjExpensify]

Do we need to add a test to the QA steps to cover the existing submitted report case? I take it we want to handle this like any other approval workflow change after a report has already been submitted?

Existing submitted report

1. As the approver (userB) submit a report on the workspace
2. As the admin (userA), enable prevent self-approvals
3. As userB, verify you still see an Approve button on the submitted report
4. as userB, approve the report
5. Verify the report is approved and forwarded to userA for approval (because the workflow has now changed).
6. As userA, approve the report.
7. Verify the report is final approved.

[alitoshmatov]

Reviewer Checklist

• I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
• I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
  • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
  • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
  • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
• I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• If a new component is created I verified that:
  • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • The file is named correctly
  • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
• I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

psa-android.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

psa-mweb.mp4

iOS: Native

psa-ios.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

psa-safari.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

psa-web.mov

MacOS: Desktop

psa-desktop.mov

[alitoshmatov]

LGTM!

[melvin-bot]

@MarioExpensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[MarioExpensify]

Nice!! I'll review this later today / early tomorrow. Thank you 😄

[lakchote]

@MarioExpensify if you could review this today that'd be great!

[MarioExpensify]

@lakchote Yep, I'm on it right now. Can you please merge main? It seems there are conflicts 😞

[MarioExpensify]

Everything looks good, let's get the conflict solved so we can merge! Thank you

[lakchote]

The conflicts are going to be fun to handle. I'll report back when you can merge 😅

[lakchote]

@MarioExpensify ready for review again!

[OSBotify]

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MarioExpensify in version: 9.0.96-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	success ✅

[IuliiaHerets]

This PR is failing because of issue #56644, #56645

[lakchote]

This PR is failing because of issue #56644, #56645

I'll be handling these two issues.

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.0.96-1 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	true ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	failure ❌

[parasharrajat]

Because we can remove a user from the member details page also, we should also handle the case when there is only one member left on the workspace and the members were removed from the member details page.

#56644