Skip to content

fix: iOS Hybrid - Native share - Switching between Submit and Share causes keyboard to lose focus.#63741

Merged
amyevans merged 13 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
Krishna2323:krishna2323/issue/62206
Jul 7, 2025
Merged

fix: iOS Hybrid - Native share - Switching between Submit and Share causes keyboard to lose focus.#63741
amyevans merged 13 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
Krishna2323:krishna2323/issue/62206

Conversation

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 commented Jun 9, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #62206
PROPOSAL: #62206 (comment)

Tests

  • Precondition: Log in to the app
  • Note: Can only be tested on native app
  1. Open the Gallery on the phone
  2. Select a photo or receipt and share it with the app
  3. On the share screen
  4. Tap on the Share button and switch to the Submit button and vice versa
  5. Verify input is focused when tab is changed
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  • Precondition: Log in to the app
  • Note: Can only be tested on native ap
  1. Open the Gallery on the phone
  2. Select a photo or receipt and share it with the app
  3. On the share screen
  4. Tap on the Share button and switch to the Submit button and vice versa
  5. Verify input is focused when tab is changed

QA Steps

  • Precondition: Log in to the app
  • Note: Can only be tested on native app
  1. Open the Gallery on the phone
  2. Select a photo or receipt and share it with the app
  3. On the share screen
  4. Tap on the Share button and switch to the Submit button and vice versa
  5. Verify input is focused when tab is changed
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android_native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

…auses keyboard to lose focus.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2025 11:36
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 9, 2025 11:36
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from c3024 and removed request for a team June 9, 2025 11:36
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 9, 2025

@c3024 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jun 13, 2025

@Krishna2323

Please fix the conflicts.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@c3024, I think we should hold on this issue.

@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jun 21, 2025

Okay. Please add it in the title.

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 changed the title fix: iOS Hybrid - Native share - Switching between Submit and Share causes keyboard to lose focus. [Hold for https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/64207]fix: iOS Hybrid - Native share - Switching between Submit and Share causes keyboard to lose focus. Jun 22, 2025
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 changed the title [Hold for https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/64207]fix: iOS Hybrid - Native share - Switching between Submit and Share causes keyboard to lose focus. [Hold for PR #64207]fix: iOS Hybrid - Native share - Switching between Submit and Share causes keyboard to lose focus. Jun 22, 2025
@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Contributor

linhvovan29546 commented Jun 24, 2025

@Krishna2323 @c3024 #63913 (comment) Merged into the main

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 force-pushed the krishna2323/issue/62206 branch from 46476bb to eaa96d9 Compare June 24, 2025 18:09
…uts.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 changed the title [Hold for PR #64207]fix: iOS Hybrid - Native share - Switching between Submit and Share causes keyboard to lose focus. fix: iOS Hybrid - Native share - Switching between Submit and Share causes keyboard to lose focus. Jun 24, 2025
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@c3024, after merging main, the solution I initially implemented stopped working. Despite multiple attempts, I couldn’t get it to work again. I noticed that we are using onTabSelectFocusHandler in NewChatSelectorPage to handle input focus on tab selection, so I applied the same approach in ShareRootPage and it works perfectly.

// We're focusing the input using internal onPageSelected to fix input focus inconsistencies on native.
// More info: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/59388
const onTabSelectFocusHandler = ({index}: {index: number}) => {
// We runAfterInteractions since the function is called in the animate block on web-based
// implementation, this fixes an animation glitch and matches the native internal delay
InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions(() => {
// Chat tab (0) / Room tab (1) according to OnyxTabNavigator (see below)
if (index === 0) {
chatPageInputRef.current?.focus();
} else if (index === 1) {
roomPageInputRef.current?.focus();
}
});
};

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jun 30, 2025

With the changes to MoneyRequestParticipantsSelector, the text input autofocus behavior is broken in the standard ‘Create Expense’ flow.

Screen.Recording.2025-06-30.at.12.27.28.PM.mov

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@c3024 ^ issue fixed

@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jul 4, 2025

This PR introduced a behavior where the text input should be focused only after the contact import modal is dismissed on native apps.

However, the current changes in the PR focus the input even before the modal is dismissed, resulting in unexpected behavior where the on-screen keyboard opens over the contact import modal:

Screen.Recording.2025-07-04.at.12.32.01.PM.mov

Steps to reproduce (on iOS app_:
1. Create a new account
2. Start the Create Expense flow from the FAB
3. If using a simulator, do not use the hardware keyboard — use the software keyboard
4. Tap the To field to select a participant
5. The text input gets focused and the on-screen keyboard appears, while the contact import modal remains visible in the background

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@c3024, ^ issue fixed now:

Monosnap.screencast.2025-07-04.23-49-53.mp4
Monosnap.screencast.2025-07-04.23-52-55.mp4

@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jul 7, 2025

I am seeing this Not found page on create expense flow on Android. Does not seem related to this PR but it does not exist on main also. Could you merge main into this branch?

Screen.Recording.2025-07-07.at.6.57.30.AM.mov

@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jul 7, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
shareAndroid.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
shareAndroidmWeb.mov
iOS: HybridApp
shareiOS.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
shareiOSmWeb.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
shareChrome.mov
MacOS: Desktop
shareDesktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@c3024 c3024 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from amyevans July 7, 2025 08:21
@amyevans amyevans merged commit 7f843cc into Expensify:main Jul 7, 2025
19 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 7, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/amyevans in version: 9.1.78-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.78-4 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Comment on lines +602 to +605
onFocusTextInput={() => {
setTextInputAutoFocus(true);
selectionListRef.current?.focusTextInput?.();
}}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line causes: #70626

More details:
#70626 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants