Skip to content

Enable multiple receipts#64941

Merged
lakchote merged 101 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:feat/59441-multiple-receipts
Jul 4, 2025
Merged

Enable multiple receipts#64941
lakchote merged 101 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:feat/59441-multiple-receipts

Conversation

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor

@koko57 koko57 commented Jun 25, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #59441
PROPOSAL: -

Tests

WEB / DESKTOP

  1. FAB -> Create Expense -> Scan
  2. Drop several files on the drop zone
  3. Verify that you're redirected to the participant step
  4. Choose a participant, go to confirmation
  5. Verify that on the confirmation step you see the carousel for the receipts and the transactions count is equal to the receipts count
  6. Click "Create expenses" - verify that the transactions are created

Adding a new file

  1. Repeat steps 1-5
  2. Go back to the Scan step
  3. Drop a few more files
  4. Go to the confirmation
  5. Verify that the transaction count is equal to the count of the files you've dropped in at the beginning and the files you've dropped later.

Starting the flow from the Chat

  1. Go to a DM or Workspace Chat
  2. Drop several files on the drop zone
  3. Verify that you're redirected to the confirmation step
  4. Verify that the participant is displayed correctly
  5. Click "Create expenses" - verify that the transactions are created

Error handling

  1. Start the IOU flow either from the FAB or the chat
  2. Drop several files - choose some that exceed size limit (10MB), doesn't have a supported type or drop more than 30 files
  3. Verify that the error modal appears with a correct message
  4. Click Continue - verify that you are navigated to the next step
  5. On confirmation step verify that only valid files were added
  6. If all the files were not valid, verify that instead of continuing the flow, the flow was cancelled

Disable BETA

  1. Verify that the drop zones that are currently used (not the new ones) are working as before

MOBILE

  1. FAB -> Create Expense -> Scan
  2. Click Gallery button -> Choose FIles / Choose from Gallery
  3. Verify that you can select several files
  4. Verify that you're redirected to the participant step
  5. Choose a participant, go to confirmation
  6. Verify that on the confirmation step you see the carousel for the receipts and the transactions count is equal to the receipts count
  7. Click "Create expenses" - verify that the transactions are created
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

same as above, but skip DISABLE BETA part

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-06-25.at.21.32.27.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.-.2025-06-26.at.07.27.25.mp4
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.-.2025-06-26.at.07.26.37.mp4
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.-.2025-06-26.at.07.51.34.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.-.2025-06-26.at.07.48.39.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-06-25.at.18.47.04.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-06-25.at.18.42.18.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-06-26.at.07.35.32.mp4
Screen.Recording.2025-06-26.at.07.33.48.mp4

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jul 4, 2025

Screen.Recording.2025-07-04.at.16.25.12.mp4

@shubham1206agra the problem with [object Object] - fixed!

I don't see the problem with report IDs - it creates expense in the report I selected

May I ask you for re-review?

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • xIf a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-07-05.at.12.26.04.AM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-07-04.at.11.38.29.PM.mov
iOS: HybridApp

NA since Picker is broken in HybridApp

iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-07-04.at.11.19.05.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-07-04.at.11.09.40.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-07-04.at.11.45.18.PM.mov

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 4, 2025

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #59441 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from danieldoglas July 4, 2025 19:02
@lakchote lakchote merged commit 3d79946 into Expensify:main Jul 4, 2025
19 of 21 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 4, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

@danieldoglas danieldoglas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏾

@kavimuru
Copy link

kavimuru commented Jul 7, 2025

@lakchote How should we disable BETA and which domain is BETA?

Disable BETA

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Jul 7, 2025

I think it means an account without the beta (newDotMultiFilesDragAndDrop) enabled @kavimuru

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/lakchote in version: 9.1.77-1 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@kavimuru
Copy link

kavimuru commented Jul 7, 2025

I think it means an account without the beta (newDotMultiFilesDragAndDrop) enabled @kavimuru

Is applause.expensifail.com domain under Beta and public domain not under beta?

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jul 8, 2025

@lakchote How should we disable BETA and which domain is BETA?

Disable BETA

@kavimuru if you could add several files and handle multiple transactions you can skip this DISABLE BETA check, please test the rest of the flow

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.77-2 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

if (otherFiles.some((file) => isHeicOrHeifImage(file))) {
setIsLoaderVisible(true);

return Promise.all(otherFiles.map((file) => convertHeicImageToJpegPromise(file))).then((convertedImages) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

HEIC conversion could fail, but the error was not caught and blocked the UI (issue: #68778). We fixed it in PR #70273.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants