Skip to content

Conversation

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 commented Jun 27, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #62907
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Precondition:

  • Set device font size to the minimum
  • Kill the app then relaunch Expensify app
  1. Open FAB > Start chat
  2. Tap on the search field
  3. Enter "hello google"
    4 Verify the text is shown without any cutoff
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Precondition:

  • Set device font size to the minimum
  • Kill the app then relaunch Expensify app
  1. Open FAB > Start chat
  2. Tap on the search field
  3. Enter "hello google"
    4 Verify the text is shown without any cutoff

QA Steps

Precondition:

  • Set device font size to the minimum
  • Kill the app then relaunch Expensify app
  1. Open FAB > Start chat
  2. Tap on the search field
  3. Enter "hello google"
    4 Verify the text is shown without any cutoff
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android_native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_natvie.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop_app.mp4

…font size is minimum.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2025 09:32
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 requested review from a team as code owners June 27, 2025 09:32
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from dominictb and removed request for a team June 27, 2025 09:32
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@dominictb Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

The loading indicator looks way off in this video?
CleanShot 2025-06-27 at 11 41 17@2x

Perhaps you can also share a quick before & after set of screenshots? Thanks!

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

The loading indicator will be fixed in this PR.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Ah okay, thanks for confirming. Would still love a quick before/after of the two mobile platforms just for posterity. Thanks!

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

BEFORE:

loading_indicator_before

AFTER:
loading_indicator_after

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

That's good for the indicator. But I mean before/after of what you are fixing in this specific PR.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

Before (The letter 'g' is half-visible):

before.mp4

After:

after.mp4

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Perfect, that looks pretty good to me 👍 I say we get this into final review then.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dominictb, please review this when you get a chance. Thanks!

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

BUG: On native, the currency and value are misaligned:

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

BUG: Room description field label is misaligned

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

BUG: Private notes field has large bottom padding:

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dominictb, all the above issues have been fixed.

Note: All the issues were also reproducible without the original PR changes.

Fixed

Monosnap.screencast.2025-07-01.06-42-18.mp4

Reproducible without input update PR

Monosnap.screencast.2025-06-30.22-27-00.mp4

tabIndex={-1}
style={[styles.textInputPrefix, !hasLabel && styles.pv0, styles.pointerEventsNone, prefixStyle]}
dataSet={{[CONST.SELECTION_SCRAPER_HIDDEN_ELEMENT]: true}}
shouldUseDefaultLineHeight={!Object.keys(StyleSheet.flatten(prefixStyle)).includes('lineHeight') && !shouldApplyHeight}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is something I asked to fix earlier https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/63034/files#r2143503208. We should not assume it this way.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for missing that. I think this is the right way to handle it because if we introduce a prop for this, we’d need to pass both the prop and lineHeight: undefined to make it work. But with this approach, we can simply pass lineHeight: undefined without any extra steps. Do you still think we should add a prop?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes I think we still need the prop. There might be cases where we intentionally set the lineHeight to undefined just to reset a previously-set lineHeight value but still want to use the default lineHeight in Text component.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

Testing again

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

BUG: Tax value page is misaligned

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dominictb friendly bump ^

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

This is not fixed for me #65071 (comment). I THINK it has the same root cause with this one #63034 (comment) which I could but you couldn't reproduce. It was fixed in this commit 05f020d.

It would be much much better if you could find out consistent reliable reproducible steps on your device too so we can early spot similar issues.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll try to find reliable reproduction steps.

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Any update?

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dominictb, sorry for delay, I'll try to finish this within 24h. Still trying to reproduce the issue on my end.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dominictb, could you please check this again? The issue occurred because we were using extraSymbol without applying styles.lineHeightUndefined to it.

extraSymbol={<Text style={styles.iouAmountText}>%</Text>}

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

BUG: Right icon is misaligned

simulator_screenshot_6299182E-AA05-4285-A8D0-B3062E72D850

This seems to be the last bug.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

BUG: Right icon is misaligned

@dominictb fixed.

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

dominictb commented Jul 29, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp Screenshot_1753763530
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot_1753763698
iOS: HybridApp Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-07-29 at 11 13 06
iOS: mWeb Safari simulator_screenshot_23621AE9-63A7-41BF-B25F-E5BEFCD78513
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2025-07-29 at 11 25 34
MacOS: Desktop Screenshot 2025-07-29 at 11 29 49

Comment on lines 1406 to 1408
marginTop: -(inputPaddingTop / 2),
height: '100%',
justifyContent: 'center',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you elaborate these changes?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’ve updated the logic to dynamically center the icon instead of using a fixed marginTop.
Let’s say the input container is 52px tall with:

paddingTop = 8px
paddingBottom = 0px

Normally, the icon container takes the full height after top padding, so its height becomes:

icon height = 52px - 8px = 44px

But visually, we want the icon to look centered within the full 52px height, not just the 44px.
To achieve that, we calculate the vertical padding difference:

paddingTop - paddingBottom = 8px - 0px = 8px

We then divide this difference by 2 to get the offset needed for centering:

8px / 2 = 4px

Now, we apply a negative marginTop of -4px to the icon container:

marginTop: -(verticalPaddingDiff / 2)

This pulls the icon upward just enough to make it visually centered in the full height, regardless of uneven padding.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But from the implementation I see that you're summing up the vertical paddings, right? Also the param name should be verticalPaddingDiff or something else, inputPaddingTop is not correct.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oops, sorry I forgot to push the local commit.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@dominictb dominictb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from techievivek July 29, 2025 22:05
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dominictb The checklist isn’t checked off. 😅

@techievivek techievivek merged commit 5de4e79 into Expensify:main Jul 30, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/techievivek in version: 9.1.88-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/grgia in version: 9.1.88-3 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants