-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
[Export Templates]Add account level and policy level in-app export options #68044
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@parasharrajat this is the last one 🙌 it's ready for review though it'll be on hold until the Auth PRs are merged + deployed - but please give this a look through! 🙇 (Adding screen recordings now) |
|
@eVoloshchak Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
| const [csvExportLayouts] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.NVP_CSV_EXPORT_LAYOUTS, {canBeMissing: true}); | ||
|
|
||
| // Collate the list of user-created in-app export templates | ||
| const customInAppTemplates = useMemo(() => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic for getting export template options ( both IS templates and in-app ones) is pretty duplicated across MoneyReportHeader, useSelectedTransactionsActions, and SearchPage.
I'd like to de-dupe it, but in the interest of speed, let's keep that as a follow-up to this PR when we're not on as much of a time crunch 🙏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good.
|
Sure |
|
thank you!!! |
|
made one change that fixed the account level export! |
|
@parasharrajat i've got a backend PR to fix that issue ⏫ can you confirm if this is ready to go otherwise please 🙇? Confirmed the backend PR fixes the issue:
|
|
Backend PR has been merged and should be deployed today so taking this off hold |
|
Awesome. I will do the final review when backend is ready. |
|
nice, thank you! the backend only fixes that one small bug (policy level templates not appearing on mobile sometimes) so if you have time/wanted to check the other platforms feel free to start on those |
| // If all of the transactions are on the same policy, add the policy-level in-app export templates as export options | ||
| if (selectedPolicyIDs.length === 1) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this, if you have more than 500 expenses and use "Select all matching items", it's possible some of the other non-loaded transactions will be on other policies, even though all the loaded ones are on the same policy.
I don't think it's necessarily a bug though, just putting it out there. I don't think there's an easy solution other than loading all expenses or making a API call that would return the unique policy IDs for a search query, but that's unoptimal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, yeah, good point... We could probably filter them out in the auth command since the report data we load before processing the formulas should have the policyID
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Filter them out in what Auth command?
In the end, I don't think it's an issue if you export an expense or report with a layout that's defined in a different policy, right? Like, nothing can break, and the worst possible case is that your tags / employee custom fields / GL codes are defined differently, and the output is slightly inconsistent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in ExportSearchWithTemplate but yes agreed it's not an urgent issue - I'll test it tomorrow to see what happens
|
The last backend PR was just deployed, this should be all set for full review now 🚀 |
|
I will review shortly. |
|
@parasharrajat any update here? 🙇 |
|
Just got back. I will test in 1 hour. |
Screenshots🔲 iOS / native14.08.2025_00.21.56_REC.mp4🔲 iOS / Safari14.08.2025_00.27.29_REC.mp4🔲 MacOS / Desktop14.08.2025_00.15.57_REC.mp4🔲 MacOS / Chrome08.08.2025_22.30.53_REC.mp408.08.2025_22.36.28_REC.mp4🔲 Android / Chrome14.08.2025_00.10.23_REC.mp4🔲 Android / native14.08.2025_00.04.01_REC.mp4 |
parasharrajat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added
Designlabel so the design team can review the changes.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
|
@Beamanator Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
|
It looks good to me. Pending/not handled tasks.
|
|
let's gooooooooo 🚀 |
That was handled as part of an issue before the Export Templates project but maybe @flaviadefaria knows the answer |
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.1.94-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 9.1.94-4 🚀
|


HELD on https://github.com/Expensify/Auth/pull/16256/ and https://github.com/Expensify/Auth/pull/16591/HELD on https://github.com/Expensify/Auth/pull/16653Explanation of Change
Adds support for exporting reports and expenses via user created in-app export options
Follow up to #64616 and #65149
Fixed Issues
$ #67931
$ #68068
PROPOSAL: N/A internal
Tests
Reports > Expenses
1 selectedbutton, thenExportAccount In-App Export Templateand 'Policy In-App Export Template`x selectedbutton, thenExportAccount In-App Export Templateoption onlyAccount In-App Export Templateoption and confirm you see a modal that states your export has begunPolicy In-App Export Templateoption and confirm you see a modal that states your export has begunReports > Reports
2 selectedbutton, thenExportAccount In-App Export Templateoption only2 selectedbutton, thenExportAccount In-App Export Templateand 'Policy In-App Export Template`Account In-App Export Templateoption and confirm you see a modal that states your export has begunPolicy In-App Export Templateoption and confirm you see a modal that states your export has begunReports > Single Expense Report View
Moreand theExportAccount In-App Export TemplateonlyAccount In-App Export Templateoption and confirm you see a modal that states your export has begunInbox > Report
1 selectedbutton, thenExportAccount In-App Export Templateand 'Policy In-App Export Template`Account In-App Export Templateoption and confirm you see a modal that states your export has begunPolicy In-App Export Templateoption and confirm you see a modal that states your export has begun1 selectedbutton, thenExportAccount In-App Export TemplateonlyOffline tests
Offline tests
QA Steps
Same as testing steps
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectioncanBeMissingparam foruseOnyxtoggleReportand notonIconClick)src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-08-07.at.16.08.20.mov
MacOS: Desktop