Fix - [Unreported] Add distance rate to the distance expenses tracked in selfDM

[FitseTLT]

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #72230
PROPOSAL:

Tests

I) User with no group workspace
Creation flow

1. Sign in as a user with no group workspace
2. Go to selfDM and create a distance request
3. In the confirmation page, click on the Rate field
4. Verify that you see the upgrade flow
5. Press on the upgrade button and confirm creation of a new workspace
6. Verify that you are navigated to new rate creation page
7. Input rate and save
8. Verify that the new rate is set to the expense on the confirmation page
9. Create the track expense and verfiy that the rate is correctly applied to the expense.

Edit flow

1. Sign in as a user with a group workspace
2. Create a distance request in a workspace chat
3. Unreport the distance request (Report > remove from report) to make it move to selfDM
4. Delete the group workspaces
5. Go to the distance request in the selfDM
6. Click on the Rate field
7. Verify that you see the Upgrade path
8. Press on the upgrade button and confirm creation of a new workspace
9. Verify that you are navigated to new rate creation page
10. Input rate and save
11. Verify that you are navigated to the rate selection page which also includes the new rate created above
12. Select a rate and verfiy that the rate is correctly set on the expense

II) User with a group workspace set as the default workspace

1. Sign in as a user with a group workspace set as the default one
2. Go to selfDM and create a distance request
3. In the confirmation page, Verify that the expense is set to the default rate of the default workspace
4. Click on the Rate field
5. Verify that you can pick one of the default workspace rates
6. Confirm and create the distance request
7. Now open the distance request from the selfDM
8. Click on the rate field to edit it
9. Verify that you can pick one of the rates that the default workspace has

III) User with multiple group workspaces that have the personal policy set as the default one

NOTE: To have such a user, you have to go to OldDot and make the personal policy the default workspace from there

Creation flow

1. Sign in as a user with multiple group workspaces that have the personal policy set as the default one
2. Go to selfDM and create a distance request
3. In the confirmation page, verify that you see the default p2p rate set
4. Click on the Rate field
5. Verify that you first have to choose one of the group workspaces
6. Verify that you can now pick one of the chosen workspace rates

Edit flow

1. Sign in as a user with multiple group workspaces that have the personal policy set as the default one
2. Create a distance request in a workspace chat
3. Unreport the distance request to make it move to selfDM
4. Go to the distance request in the selfDM
5. Click on the Rate field
6. Verify that you first have to choose one of the group workspaces
7. Verify that you can now pick one of the chosen workspace rates

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

Same as above

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
• If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
  • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
  • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

2025-12-06.00-56-10.mp4

Android: mWeb Chrome

2025-12-03.17-53-59.mp4

iOS: Native

2025-12-03.19-40-55.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

2025-12-03.17-52-46.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

2025-12-03.17-52-02.mp4

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/components/MoneyRequestConfirmationList.tsx	61.65% <100.00%> (ø)
...stReportView/MoneyRequestReportTransactionItem.tsx	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...stReportView/MoneyRequestReportTransactionList.tsx	1.32% <ø> (ø)
...thSections/Search/TransactionGroupListExpanded.tsx	66.66% <ø> (ø)
...ionListWithSections/Search/TransactionListItem.tsx	0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/TransactionItemRow/index.tsx	86.66% <ø> (+1.34%)	⬆️
src/hooks/usePolicyForTransaction.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/libs/DistanceRequestUtils.ts	84.61% <100.00%> (+0.32%)	⬆️
src/libs/SearchUIUtils.ts	68.40% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/TransactionPreviewUtils.ts	85.54% <100.00%> (-0.33%)	⬇️
... and 18 more
... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

[melvin-bot]

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[JmillsExpensify]

Agree that mileage expenses should have a rate even when added in selfDM

[cristipaval]

@FitseTLT @parasharrajat, the currency edits on unreported distance requests will be disabled as part of this PR

[parasharrajat]

Can you please add test steps @FitseTLT?

[mitarachim]

Deploy Blocker #83957 was identified to be related to this PR.

[vincdargento]

Deploy Blocker #83958 was identified to be related to this PR.

[vincdargento]

Deploy Blocker #83964 was identified to be related to this PR.

[mitarachim]

Deploy Blocker #83969 was identified to be related to this PR.

[mitarachim]

Deploy Blocker #83972 was identified to be related to this PR.

[mitarachim]

Deploy Blocker #83990 was identified to be related to this PR.

[nlemma]

Deploy Blocker #84007 was identified to be related to this PR.

[jponikarchuk]

Deploy Blocker #84006 was identified to be related to this PR.

[nlemma]

Deploy Blocker #84010 was identified to be related to this PR.

[mitarachim]

Deploy Blocker #84013 was identified to be related to this PR.

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.30-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.3.30-3 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.31-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.3.31-12 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅