Skip to content

Can't select an empty report from the Reports > Reports page#75261

Merged
luacmartins merged 42 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
lorretheboy:fix-v2/70591
Jan 14, 2026
Merged

Can't select an empty report from the Reports > Reports page#75261
luacmartins merged 42 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
lorretheboy:fix-v2/70591

Conversation

@lorretheboy
Copy link
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #70591
PROPOSAL: #70591 (comment)

Tests

  1. Navigate to any workspace chat
  2. Create an empty report
  3. Navigate to Reports > reports
  4. Click on the checkbox to select the empty report (On Desktop & Non-native device Web)
  5. The report is selectable by clicking the checkbox and have an option to delete
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mov
ANDROID.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
website.android.mov
ANDROID.WEBSITE.mov
iOS: Native
ios.mov
IOS.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
website.ios.mov
IOS.WEBSITE.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
website.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 16, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/MoneyReportHeader.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...stWithSections/Search/TransactionGroupListItem.tsx 75.23% <100.00%> (+3.53%) ⬆️
src/libs/actions/Search.ts 25.00% <100.00%> (+4.31%) ⬆️
...nListWithSections/Search/ExpenseReportListItem.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/libs/SearchUIUtils.ts 60.10% <33.33%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
src/components/Search/SearchContext.tsx 30.61% <0.00%> (-1.31%) ⬇️
src/components/Search/SearchList/index.tsx 2.80% <0.00%> (-0.65%) ⬇️
src/pages/Search/SearchPage.tsx 22.80% <20.00%> (-0.19%) ⬇️
src/components/Search/index.tsx 29.61% <1.17%> (-4.45%) ⬇️
... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@lorretheboy lorretheboy marked this pull request as ready for review November 23, 2025 15:19
@lorretheboy lorretheboy requested review from a team as code owners November 23, 2025 15:19
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from eh2077 and trjExpensify and removed request for a team November 23, 2025 15:19
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 23, 2025

@eh2077 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

trjExpensify
trjExpensify previously approved these changes Nov 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree with fixing this to allow selecting empty reports.

@eh2077
Copy link
Contributor

eh2077 commented Nov 24, 2025

@trjExpensify Can you have a look at #75261 (comment) about text of delete modal?

@lorretheboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eh2077 @luacmartins I have replied comments & addressed issues. Please help review again. Thxxxx

Copy link
Contributor

@eh2077 eh2077 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! LGTM 🚀

luacmartins
luacmartins previously approved these changes Jan 12, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. We have conflicts though @lorretheboy

@lorretheboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@luacmartins Conflicts are resolved. Thxx

Copy link
Contributor

@eh2077 eh2077 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

new changes look good

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from luacmartins January 14, 2026 12:23
@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit 5f419d2 into Expensify:main Jan 14, 2026
32 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.3.2-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor

Gonals commented Jan 15, 2026

Seems like this has caused a blocker. @eh2077, @lorretheboy, @luacmartins, can you take a look?

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@Gonals this PR was reverted already

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.3.3-8 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants