Skip to content

Revert "[Part 1]: Remove Onyx.connect() for the key: ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TRANSACTION_VIOLATIONS in src/libs/TransactionUtils/index.ts"#78255

Closed
yuwenmemon wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-77119-refactor-651
Closed

Revert "[Part 1]: Remove Onyx.connect() for the key: ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TRANSACTION_VIOLATIONS in src/libs/TransactionUtils/index.ts"#78255
yuwenmemon wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
revert-77119-refactor-651

Conversation

@yuwenmemon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reverts #77119

…ION.TRANSACTION_VIOLATIONS in src/libs/TransactionUtils/index.ts"
@yuwenmemon yuwenmemon self-assigned this Dec 22, 2025
@yuwenmemon yuwenmemon requested review from a team as code owners December 22, 2025 05:28
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from heyjennahay and marcaaron and removed request for a team December 22, 2025 05:28
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 22, 2025

@marcaaron Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team December 22, 2025 05:29
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @yuwenmemon has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #78255.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ ⏩ SKIPPED ⏩
The build for Android was skipped The build for iOS was skipped
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ https://78255.pr-testing.expensify.com
The build for Desktop was skipped Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@yuwenmemon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

yuwenmemon commented Dec 22, 2025

I was still able to reproduce the regression here locally on this revert PR but checking an Ad-Hoc build just in case I'm holding it wrong...

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/libs/ReportPrimaryActionUtils.ts 90.61% <100.00%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
src/libs/ReportSecondaryActionUtils.ts 92.94% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
src/libs/TransactionUtils/index.ts 71.79% <100.00%> (+0.12%) ⬆️
src/components/MoneyReportHeader.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/libs/actions/IOU.ts 64.91% <25.00%> (ø)
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

@yuwenmemon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yep, this ain't the one.

@yuwenmemon yuwenmemon closed this Dec 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant