Skip to content

feat: implement SearchBarChart component#80658

Merged
neil-marcellini merged 47 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:add-search-bar-chart-component
Jan 29, 2026
Merged

feat: implement SearchBarChart component#80658
neil-marcellini merged 47 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:add-search-bar-chart-component

Conversation

@mateuuszzzzz
Copy link
Contributor

@mateuuszzzzz mateuuszzzzz commented Jan 27, 2026

Explanation of Change

This PR introduces the SearchBarChart component as part of the Insights project, enabling a bar chart visualization in the search view when the user types view:bar withgroup-by.

New Charts infrastructure:

  • Added a reusable BarChart component built on top of Victory Native and @shopify/react-native-skia, with platform-specific entry points for web and native
  • Created supporting components: ChartHeader (displays title and selected value), ChartTooltip (shows details on bar hover/press)
  • Implemented custom hooks for chart interactions (useChartInteractions,useChartInteractionState), label formatting (useChartLabelFormats), and label layout (useChartLabelLayout)
  • Added a chart color palette system and shared constants/types

Search integration:

  • Added SearchChartView which fetches search data and transforms it into
    chart-compatible format, grouping results by category with currency-based
    Y-axis values
  • The chart is conditionally rendered in the Search component when
    queryJSON.view === 'bar'
  • Added currency formatting utilities in CurrencyUtils for axis labels

Fixed Issues

$ #80534
PROPOSAL:

MOBILE-EXPENSIFY: https://github.com/Expensify/Mobile-Expensify/pull/13830

Tests

  • Render bar chart with type:expense group-by:category view:bar - verify bars display correctly
  • Hover over bar (web) - verify tooltip shows <category> • <amount> (<percentage>)
  • Click/tap on bar - verify navigation to filtered search type:expense category:"<selected>"
  • Test with 5 bars, 20 bars, 50+ bars - verify X-axis labels rotate/truncate/skip appropriately and there is no overlap.

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native Screenshot 2026-01-29 at 12 47 18
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2026-01-29 at 12 49 11
iOS: Native Screenshot 2026-01-29 at 12 17 10
iOS: mWeb Safari Screenshot 2026-01-29 at 12 53 05
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2026-01-29 at 12 47 42

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/Charts/constants.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/Charts/font/index.native.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/libs/SearchQueryUtils.ts 70.55% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
src/styles/index.ts 42.47% <ø> (ø)
src/components/Charts/BarChart/index.native.tsx 50.00% <50.00%> (ø)
src/components/Charts/font/index.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/Charts/ChartHeader.tsx 33.33% <33.33%> (ø)
src/libs/DateUtils.ts 63.81% <0.00%> (-0.36%) ⬇️
src/components/Charts/chartColors.ts 71.42% <71.42%> (ø)
src/components/Search/index.tsx 30.09% <20.00%> (-0.12%) ⬇️
... and 10 more
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

@mateuuszzzzz mateuuszzzzz changed the title feat: Implement SearchBarChart component feat: implement SearchBarChart component Jan 28, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @puneetlath has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

@Expensify/design this is our first chart! Mind giving the ad-hoc a spin and sharing your feedback?

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like it's crashing on web but mobile is working. To test it, type this into the Reports page search type:expense group-by:category view:bar

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Dang, excited to see this on web! But will take mobile for a spin in the meantime.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm I can't seem to sign in on the mobile adhoc build, I keep getting an "invalid authentication code" even though I'm pasting directly from the authenticator app. So 2FA seems broken for some reason, though my Expensify magic code is working. Not sure if that's a separate problem on main somewhere.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@shawnborton on the iOS adhoc build app I can sign-in with Google to bypass magic code/2FA etc.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

I saw a bar chart on mobile! I can't scroll the page when it's rendered though, so it's hard to check it out properly at this point.

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, the padding on mobile is also too big. The card itself should also have 20px padding on mobile. Currently it's 32px:

image

Still find those vertical labels to be a bit weird

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

(Sidenote: I think maybe we leave it for now until we can test more, but I've started some explorations in Figma on how to better show negative values on the chart)

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Should we consider making charts horizontally scrollable on mobile when they have > X bars? Otherwise they feel pretty poor and illegible.

Agree that the axis labels are feeling pretty odd as well.

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Should we consider making charts horizontally scrollable on mobile when they have > X bars? Otherwise they feel pretty poor and illegible.

I think the plan is to figure this out after V1 👍

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #80658 Mobile-Expensify PR Expensify/Mobile-Expensify#13830.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ ⏩ SKIPPED ⏩
The build for Android was skipped The build for iOS was skipped
Web 🕸️
https://80658.pr-testing.expensify.com
Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@ShridharGoel
Copy link
Contributor

ShridharGoel commented Jan 29, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

Screenshot_20260130_051928.jpg

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screenshot_20260130_052156.jpg

iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari Screenshot 2026-01-30 at 4 24 31 AM
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2026-01-30 at 4 01 33 AM

Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One thing to change

@ShridharGoel
Copy link
Contributor

ShridharGoel commented Jan 29, 2026

It crashes on native iOS and Android.

Screen.Recording.2026-01-30.at.4.06.31.AM.mov

@mateuuszzzzz
Copy link
Contributor Author

mateuuszzzzz commented Jan 29, 2026

It crashes on native.

Screen.Recording.2026-01-30.at.4.06.31.AM.mov

I think you need to rebuild your app. This error states that native module cannot be found so probably you haven't compiled it yet

@ShridharGoel
Copy link
Contributor

Makes sense, I'll check by creating a fresh build.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @trjExpensify has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@ShridharGoel
Copy link
Contributor

ShridharGoel commented Jan 29, 2026

The last few labels are not showing (or maybe there are skips in between but the spacing is not proper).

Screenshot 2026-01-30 at 4 16 07 AM

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@ShridharGoel that one is something we're going to patch upstream, so @mateuuszzzzz will create a separate issue for it shortly.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #80658 Mobile-Expensify PR Expensify/Mobile-Expensify#13830.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-android-Adhoc-baadf55-68f7a31dd211162930476455e466a2256b933f66/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-ios-device-AdHoc-baadf55-51325f91fc8db48ad948069ae59df5bd1eb4ebca/index.html
Android iOS
Web 🕸️
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩
The build for Web was skipped

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from neil-marcellini January 29, 2026 23:53
@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini merged commit 1421019 into Expensify:main Jan 29, 2026
39 of 40 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 9.3.11-16 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Feb 5, 2026

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.3.12-1 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants