Skip to content

Add required SignerFields#81602

Merged
Gonals merged 13 commits intomainfrom
nikki-fix-invalid-inputs
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

Add required SignerFields#81602
Gonals merged 13 commits intomainfrom
nikki-fix-invalid-inputs

Conversation

@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor

@NikkiWines NikkiWines commented Feb 5, 2026

Explanation of Change

This PR fixes an issue where required signer fields (signerFullName, signerDateOfBirth, signerJobTitle) were being silently omitted from the API request payload when not present in the form draft. This caused the Auth backend to receive incomplete data and fail with cryptic validation errors like "Invalid inputs" instead of properly identifying which required fields were missing.

Fix:

  1. Added a requiredSignerFields constant defining which fields must always be sent to the backend
  2. Modified the logic to always include required fields (with empty string if not present) so the backend can properly validate and return meaningful error messages
  3. Used SafeString() to ensure consistent string handling

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/593959
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Go to a workspace with Non-USD bank account setup in progress
  2. Navigate to the Signer Info step
  3. Complete the form with all required fields filled
  4. Submit and verify the request succeeds
  5. Check the network tab to verify signerDateOfBirth, signerFullName, and signerJobTitle are present in the payload

Offline tests

N/A - This change affects form submission, which requires network connectivity

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. On staging, attempt to complete the Non-USD bank account Signer Info step
  2. Verify all required signer fields are being sent in the API request
  3. Verify that if any required field is missing, a proper validation error is returned instead of generic "Invalid inputs"

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

N/A - Backend/utility change only, no UI changes

Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A - Backend/utility change only, no UI changes

iOS: Native

N/A - Backend/utility change only, no UI changes

iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A - Backend/utility change only, no UI changes

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A - Backend/utility change only, no UI changes

@NikkiWines NikkiWines self-assigned this Feb 5, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ils/getSignerDetailsAndSignerFilesForSignerInfo.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

@NikkiWines NikkiWines marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2026 19:19
@NikkiWines NikkiWines requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2026 19:19
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from jayeshmangwani February 6, 2026 19:19
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@jayeshmangwani Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team February 6, 2026 19:19
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6131c9f7fc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@joekaufmanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

No product review needed

@joekaufmanexpensify joekaufmanexpensify removed their request for review February 9, 2026 14:07
@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jayeshmangwani are you able to review please 🙇

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, I’m testing the PR now.

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

@NikkiWines , when we send signerDateOfBirth as an empty string, we receive a generic error message instead of a field-specific error (e.g., Auth UpdateCorpayOnboardingAdditionalData returned an error).


Note: There is also an existing bug in prod. When the Date of Birth date picker is opened and the user clicks outside the modal without selecting a date, a default date appears to be selected initially. However, after completing all the steps and returning to the final Signer Info review page, no date is selected. Additionally, no validation error is shown on the FE side.

I’ve attached a video below showing the steps to reproduce the issue.

date-selection-bug.mov

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

@NikkiWines , whenever you get a chance, please see the comment above #81602 (comment) and confirm whether we need to make any BE changes so it sends the specific error message for the missing value.

@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor Author

NikkiWines commented Feb 18, 2026

Sorry for the delay @jayeshmangwani, I'm unable to reproduce the bug you identified in dev (even on main), there is no default DOB selected (as least for UK bank accounts). I'm also not able to reproduce the bug with these steps:

When the Date of Birth date picker is opened and the user clicks outside the modal without selecting a date, a default date appears to be selected initially.

Screen.Recording.2026-02-18.at.13.36.36.mov

I'll try now with a CAD bank account to see

Edit: Same behavior as the GBP

@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jayeshmangwani responded to your review above, can you take a look please 🙇

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, I missed the above comments.

@NikkiWines , I’m still seeing the issue. Here are the detailed steps to reproduce it:

  1. Add one bank account under WS → Workflows → Payments. Fill in the information up to Step 6 (Agreements).
    • Set the currency to CAD.
    • In Step 5 (Signer Info), select “No” for “Are you a director at Testing?”
  2. Click on the pending bank account and select “Continue setup.”
  3. You will be navigated to the Agreements step.
  4. Click Back, it will take you to Step 5.
  5. Select “Yes” and click Continue.
  6. Enter the legal name and job title.
    • For Date of Birth, a date is preselected, do not change it.
    • Click Next.
  7. Add the address and click Next, then upload a document on the Additional Document page.
  8. Click Next, and then Next again on the Double Check page.
  9. At this point, we can see the BE error.
bug-repro.mov

I’m adding the cURL and response below. If you need the specific account I’m testing with, please let me know and I’ll DM you.

cURL
curl 'https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082/api/SaveCorpayOnboardingDirectorInformation?' \
  -H 'Accept: */*' \
  -H 'Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.9' \
  -H 'Connection: keep-alive' \
  -H 'Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI' \
  -H 'Origin: https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082' \
  -H 'Referer: https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082/bank-account/validate?backTo=workspaces%2F4EDECBD7692AD744%2Fworkflows&policyID=4EDECBD7692AD744' \
  -H 'Sec-Fetch-Dest: empty' \
  -H 'Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors' \
  -H 'Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin' \
  -H 'User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/145.0.0.0 Safari/537.36' \
  -H 'sec-ch-ua: "Not:A-Brand";v="99", "Google Chrome";v="145", "Chromium";v="145"' \
  -H 'sec-ch-ua-mobile: ?0' \
  -H 'sec-ch-ua-platform: "macOS"' \
  --data-raw $'------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="inputs"\r\n\r\n{"signerFullName":"testuing","signerEmail":"jm9828951745@gmail.com","signerJobTitle":"testing","signerDateOfBirth":"","signerCompleteResidentialAddress":"Janes Lane, Almont, CO, 81210"}\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="proofOfDirectors"; filename="1.png"\r\nContent-Type: image/png\r\n\r\n\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="bankAccountID"\r\n\r\n8950554\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="apiRequestType"\r\n\r\nwrite\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="pusherSocketID"\r\n\r\n885823.8345608\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="shouldRetry"\r\n\r\ntrue\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="canCancel"\r\n\r\ntrue\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="authToken"\r\n\r\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r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="referer"\r\n\r\necash\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="platform"\r\n\r\nweb\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="api_setCookie"\r\n\r\nfalse\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="email"\r\n\r\njm98289517+45@gmail.com\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="isFromDevEnv"\r\n\r\ntrue\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="appversion"\r\n\r\n9.3.25-4\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="clientUpdateID"\r\n\r\n11413631321\r\n------WebKitFormBoundaryh0Ple4nZgjU4xqsI--\r\n'
Response:
{
  "code": 666,
  "jsonCode": 666,
  "type": "Expensify\\Libs\\Error\\ExpError",
  "UUID": "1301298F-9273-44A4-AB99-289B9FCF5DA2",
  "message": "Auth UpdateCorpayOnboardingAdditionalData returned an error",
  "title": "",
  "data": {
      "onyxData": [
          {
              "onyxMethod": "merge",
              "key": "reimbursementAccount",
              "value": {
                  "errors": {
                      "1771929450323043": "Auth UpdateCorpayOnboardingAdditionalData returned an error"
                  }
              }
          }
      ]
  },
  "htmlMessage": "",
  "onyxData": [
      {
          "onyxMethod": "merge",
          "key": "reimbursementAccount",
          "value": {
              "errors": {
                  "1771929450323043": "Auth UpdateCorpayOnboardingAdditionalData returned an error"
              }
          }
      }
  ],
  "requestID": "9d2e53f05f839094-SJC"
}

If this BE error is unrelated, the PR looks good otherwise, and I’ll proceed with the checklist.

@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the added details @jayeshmangwani. I still haven't been able to reproduce, but I will see if our internalQA team is able to. Since this bug also exists on prod I think we can handle it separately from this issue, especially since the signer fields are now no longer silently failing

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good to me. I’ll try to add reliable repro steps and will post in the Slack #expensify-bugs channel to investigate that issue separately. We’re good to go with this PR.

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

@NikkiWines we need to merge main to fix the failing Prettier check.

Copy link
Contributor

@jayeshmangwani jayeshmangwani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from Gonals February 27, 2026 06:14
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 27, 2026

@Gonals Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 27, 2026

🎯 @jayeshmangwani, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #83655.

@Gonals Gonals merged commit 65a18a2 into main Mar 2, 2026
34 checks passed
@Gonals Gonals deleted the nikki-fix-invalid-inputs branch March 2, 2026 10:48
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2026

🚧 @Gonals has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 2, 2026

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 2, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Gonals in version: 9.3.28-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 4, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Gonals in version: 9.3.30-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 4, 2026

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.3.30-3 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants