Skip to content

[CBN] Non-USD flow refactor#83308

Open
koko57 wants to merge 45 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:refactor/79048-enable-payments-flow
Open

[CBN] Non-USD flow refactor#83308
koko57 wants to merge 45 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:refactor/79048-enable-payments-flow

Conversation

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor

@koko57 koko57 commented Feb 24, 2026

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #79048
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Prerequisites: being an admin of at least one workspace, the workspace should have global reimbursements supported currency (EUR, CAD, AUD or GBP)

  1. Go to Workspace > Workflows

  2. Click Add bank account

  3. Verify that the Country and Currency is filled in with supported values (EU Countries, Canada, Austrania or UK)

  4. Go through the flow, fill in all the fields

  5. Click browser / native back button

  6. Verify that you're redirected to the previous step, not out of the flow

  7. Go to Wallet

  8. Click Add bank account

  9. On the Bank Purpose Page choose Make Payments

  10. Choose one of the countries

  11. Repeat steps 4-6 from the previous scenario

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-03-03.at.16.17.07.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-03-03.at.16.08.56.mp4

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 24, 2026

@koko57 koko57 changed the title Refactor/79048 enable payments flow [CBN] Non-USD flow refactor Feb 26, 2026
@koko57 koko57 marked this pull request as ready for review March 3, 2026 15:53
@koko57 koko57 requested review from a team as code owners March 3, 2026 15:53
@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Mar 13, 2026

@arosiclair I needed to reintroduce backTo param to fix this bug - #83308 (comment) - because the previous solution wasn't working for the wallet page and other locations from where we can enter the flow. We will remove it after the backTo -> dynamic routes project #73825 is finished.

LMK if you're ok with that.

I'm still working on improving the redirection (discussed here #83308 (comment))

in the meantime, @dukenv0307 could you please run another round of review?

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

Looks better now

Screen.Recording.2026-03-16.at.09.52.02.mov

@arosiclair
Copy link
Contributor

@arosiclair I needed to reintroduce backTo param to fix this bug - #83308 (comment) - because the previous solution wasn't working for the wallet page and other locations from where we can enter the flow. We will remove it after the backTo -> dynamic routes project #73825 is finished.

LMK if you're ok with that.

Yup makes sense to me 👍

@koko57 koko57 requested review from MrMuzyk and dukenv0307 March 17, 2026 17:38
@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Mar 17, 2026

@dukenv0307 I think I improved redirection enough, also fixed some issues with missing data when navigating back. Could you please run another round of the review?

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@koko57 We're working on the PR to improve the animation, should we hold this PR until #85531 is merged?

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Mar 19, 2026

@koko57 We're working on the PR to improve the animation, should we hold this PR until #85531 is merged?

@dukenv0307 no we don't really have to - I changed the mechanism to navigate to each substep explicitly, so we don't have this redirection on the hook level. And when navigating explicitly we don't have the navigation problem.

So even if we decide to change that we can always do it in the PR when we'll remove the backTo param (After dynamic navigation project is finished).

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

okay, on it now

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-03-20.at.09.31.39.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2026-03-20.at.09.24.48.mov
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-03-20.at.09.27.15.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-03-20.at.09.23.04.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-03-20.at.09.18.54.mov

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from arosiclair March 20, 2026 02:36
@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@koko57 We got the conflict

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Mar 23, 2026

conflicts resolved

Copy link
Contributor

@arosiclair arosiclair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow this was even bigger than I thought it would be. Just a few comments

Comment on lines +112 to +114
[SCREENS.REIMBURSEMENT_ACCOUNT_NON_USD]: {
animationTypeForReplace: 'pop',
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change still necessary? We made some related changes in this PR recently: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/85531/changes

const ownerKeys = reimbursementAccountDraft?.beneficialOwnerKeys ?? beneficialOwnersDraftValues.beneficialOwnerKeys;

useEffect(() => {
if (reimbursementAccountDraft?.beneficialOwnerKeys || beneficialOwnersDraftValues.beneficialOwnerKeys.length === 0) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if (reimbursementAccountDraft?.beneficialOwnerKeys || beneficialOwnersDraftValues.beneficialOwnerKeys.length === 0) {
if (!reimbursementAccountDraft?.beneficialOwnerKeys || beneficialOwnersDraftValues.beneficialOwnerKeys.length === 0) {

Is this right?


type DraftValuesForSignerInfo = {
isUserDirector: boolean;
[key: string]: string | boolean;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The keys for this result object seem fixed. Can we add them all to the type?


const isAUD = currency === CONST.CURRENCY.AUD;
const pages = useMemo(() => {
const filtered = isDocusignStepRequired ? allPages : allPages.filter((p) => p.pageName !== PAGE_NAME.DOCUSIGN);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const filtered = isDocusignStepRequired ? allPages : allPages.filter((p) => p.pageName !== PAGE_NAME.DOCUSIGN);
const filteredPages = isDocusignStepRequired ? allPages : allPages.filter((p) => p.pageName !== PAGE_NAME.DOCUSIGN);

const isAUD = currency === CONST.CURRENCY.AUD;
const pages = useMemo(() => {
const filtered = isDocusignStepRequired ? allPages : allPages.filter((p) => p.pageName !== PAGE_NAME.DOCUSIGN);
return filtered.map((p) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return filtered.map((p) => {
return filtered.map((page) => {

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants