Skip to content

Feat - [Unreported] Add distance rate to the distance expenses tracked in selfDM#84136

Open
FitseTLT wants to merge 12 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
FitseTLT:revert-84084-resolve-conflict-of-revert-74967
Open

Feat - [Unreported] Add distance rate to the distance expenses tracked in selfDM#84136
FitseTLT wants to merge 12 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
FitseTLT:revert-84084-resolve-conflict-of-revert-74967

Conversation

@FitseTLT
Copy link
Contributor

@FitseTLT FitseTLT commented Mar 4, 2026

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #72230
$ #84010
$ #84013
$ #84006
$ #83964
$ #83955
$ #83990

PROPOSAL:

Tests

I) User with no group workspace
Creation flow

  1. Sign in as a user with no group workspace
  2. Go to selfDM and create a distance request
  3. In the confirmation page, click on the Rate field
  4. Verify that you see the upgrade flow
  5. Press on the upgrade button and confirm creation of a new workspace
  6. Verify that you are navigated to new rate creation page
  7. Input rate and save
  8. Verify that the new rate is set to the expense on the confirmation page
  9. Create the track expense and verfiy that the rate is correctly applied to the expense.

Edit flow

  1. Sign in as a user with a group workspace
  2. Create a distance request in a workspace chat
  3. Unreport the distance request (Report > remove from report) to make it move to selfDM
  4. Delete the group workspaces
  5. Go to the distance request in the selfDM
  6. Click on the Rate field
  7. Verify that you see the Upgrade path
  8. Press on the upgrade button and confirm creation of a new workspace
  9. Verify that you are navigated to new rate creation page
  10. Input rate and save
  11. Verify that you are navigated to the rate selection page which also includes the new rate created above
  12. Select a rate and verfiy that the rate is correctly set on the expense

II) User with a group workspace set as the default workspace

  1. Sign in as a user with a group workspace set as the default one
  2. Go to selfDM and create a distance request
  3. In the confirmation page, Verify that the expense is set to the default rate of the default workspace
  4. Click on the Rate field
  5. Verify that you can pick one of the default workspace rates
  6. Confirm and create the distance request
  7. Now open the distance request from the selfDM
  8. Click on the rate field to edit it
  9. Verify that you can pick one of the rates that the default workspace has

III) User with multiple group workspaces that have the personal policy set as the default one

NOTE: To have such a user, you have to go to OldDot and make the personal policy the default workspace from there

Creation flow

  1. Sign in as a user with multiple group workspaces that have the personal policy set as the default one
  2. Go to selfDM and create a distance request
  3. In the confirmation page, verify that you see the default p2p rate set
  4. Click on the Rate field
  5. Verify that you first have to choose one of the group workspaces
  6. Verify that you can now pick one of the chosen workspace rates

Edit flow

  1. Sign in as a user with multiple group workspaces that have the personal policy set as the default one
  2. Create a distance request in a workspace chat
  3. Unreport the distance request to make it move to selfDM
  4. Go to the distance request in the selfDM
  5. Click on the Rate field
  6. Verify that you first have to choose one of the group workspaces
  7. Verify that you can now pick one of the chosen workspace rates

Precondition:

Workspace distance unit must be different from personal distance unit.

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to self DM.
  3. Create a manual distance expense.
  4. Click Submit it to someone.
  5. Select a user (not workspace).
  6. On confirm page, verify that the distance unit and rate value are both correctly displayed based on the p2p rate.
  7. Click Create expense.
  8. Open the expense.
  9. Verify that the distance and rate have the correct value

Precondition:

Enable distance rates.
Change distance unit to Kilometers.

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to self DM.
  3. Click + > Track distance > Manual.
  4. Enter amount > Next.
  5. Click Create expense.
  6. Open the expense.
  7. Click Distance field.
  8. Verify that distance unit in the flow is kilometer (from the changes in precondition).

Precondition:

Enable Taxes and Distance rates.
Add two tax rates - 5% and 10 %.
Add a new distance rates - 1.00 / mile.
Enable Track tax in Distance rates settings.
Assign 5% tax rate to 0.725 / mile (default rate) with any tax reclaimable amount.
Assign 10% tax rate to 1.00 / mile with any tax reclaimable amount.

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to self DM.
  3. Create a manual distance expense with the default distance rate (0,725 / mile).
  4. Click Submit it to someone.
  5. Select workspace chat.
  6. On confirm page, click Rate.
  7. Select another rate (1.00 / mile).
  8. Click Create expense.
  9. Verify that tax no longer valid error will not show and the expense can be created without issue.

Precondition:

Enable Taxes and Distance rates.
Add two tax rates - 5% and 10 %.
Add two distance rates - 1.00 / mile and 2.00 / mile.
Enable Track tax in Distance rates settings.
Assign 5% tax rate to 1.00 / mile with any tax reclaimable amount.
Assign 10% tax rate to 2.00 / mile with any tax reclaimable amount.

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to self DM.
  3. Create a manual distance expense with 1.00 / mile rate.
  4. Open the expense.
  5. Go offline.
  6. Click Rate.
  7. Select 2.00 / mile rate.
  8. Verify Tax and Tax amount field are updated to 10% tax rate.

Precondition:

Workspace has at least two distance rates.

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to self DM.
  3. Create a manual distance expense.
  4. Open the expense.
  5. Go offline.
  6. Click Rate and select another rate.
  7. Go back to self DM.
  8. Click Submit it to someone.
  9. Select workspace chat.
  10. On confirm page, go online.
  11. Verify To field on confirm page will not change after returning online.

Precondition:

Disable Submissions in Workflows settings.

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Open FAB > Track distance > Manual.
  3. Enter amount > Next.
  4. On confirm page, click To field.
  5. Select self DM again.
  6. Verify Distance and Rate field will not change after reselecting self DM.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

Same as above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
2025-12-06.00-56-10.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
2025-12-03.17-53-59.mp4
iOS: Native
2025-12-03.19-40-55.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
2025-12-03.17-52-46.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
2025-12-03.17-52-02.mp4
2026-03-05.22-39-48.mp4
2026-03-05.22-31-40.mp4

…FitseTLT/feat-apply-policyForMovingExpenses-for-rate-field-for-track-distance-expenses""
@FitseTLT FitseTLT changed the title Revert "[CP Staging] Revert "Merge pull request #74967 from FitseTLT/feat-apply-policyForMovingExpenses-for-rate-field-for-track-distance-expenses"" Feat - [Unreported] Add distance rate to the distance expenses tracked in selfDM Mar 5, 2026
@FitseTLT FitseTLT marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2026 20:09
@FitseTLT FitseTLT requested review from a team as code owners March 5, 2026 20:09
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from parasharrajat and trjExpensify and removed request for a team March 5, 2026 20:09
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 5, 2026

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ad2443ed89

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

const hasPendingWaypoints = 'waypoints' in transactionChanges;
const hasModifiedDistanceRate = 'customUnitRateID' in transactionChanges;
if (transaction && updatedTransaction && (hasPendingWaypoints || hasModifiedDistanceRate)) {
if (transaction && updatedTransaction && hasPendingWaypoints) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Clear draft when persisting distance-rate changes

By dropping hasModifiedDistanceRate from this cleanup condition, successful track-expense rate edits no longer remove TRANSACTION_DRAFT entries. That leaves stale draft customUnitRateID/distance-unit data around, and later submit/share/categorize flows can read those drafts (via shouldUseTransactionDraft) instead of the persisted transaction, causing users to move or submit expenses with the wrong rate data.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/MoneyRequestConfirmationList.tsx 61.70% <100.00%> (ø)
...stReportView/MoneyRequestReportTransactionItem.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...stReportView/MoneyRequestReportTransactionList.tsx 1.14% <ø> (ø)
...thSections/Search/TransactionGroupListExpanded.tsx 65.38% <ø> (ø)
...ionListWithSections/Search/TransactionListItem.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/TransactionItemRow/index.tsx 86.40% <ø> (+1.36%) ⬆️
src/hooks/usePolicyForTransaction.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/libs/DistanceRequestUtils.ts 86.36% <100.00%> (+0.17%) ⬆️
src/libs/SearchUIUtils.ts 69.89% <ø> (+2.19%) ⬆️
src/libs/TransactionPreviewUtils.ts 83.14% <100.00%> (+26.00%) ⬆️
... and 18 more
... and 216 files with indirect coverage changes

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat can you review today?
@FitseTLT you've picked up a conflict.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Yes in testing

trjExpensify
trjExpensify previously approved these changes Mar 6, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Core PR for a WN project. 👍

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat update please?

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Mar 10, 2026

Screenshots

10.03.2026_18.09.17_REC.mp4
10.03.2026_16.34.04_REC.mp4
10.03.2026_17.20.57_REC.mp4
10.03.2026_17.24.34_REC.mp4
10.03.2026_17.27.36_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat

This comment was marked as outdated.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Ignore the above bug. I had 2 non-default workspaces, so in that case, it makes sense that the unit is based on P2p

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Mar 10, 2026

How should we handle this case? @cristipaval @FitseTLT

Here, the tracked expense has a km unit when it was created. Then we are submitting that to a workspace with miles.

10.03.2026_17.16.36_REC.mp4

The same thing happens when editing the same tracked expense.

10.03.2026_17.18.57_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Tested all reported bugs and they are looking good.

@FitseTLT
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, nice catch @parasharrajat. What should be the unit @cristipaval in this case, km or mi? After it is submitted, I see that the BE chooses the mi unit.

@cristipaval
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm.. this is a good one. It works consistently with the other fields: we preserve the values set on the tracked expense fields and display the options from the default workspace when editing, or from the applicable workspace when submitting.

@trjExpensify, what do you think from a product perspective? Does this make sense?

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

After it is submitted, I see that the BE chooses the mi unit.

What does this mean? The backend change the unit silently after creation? If so, why wouldn't we do that for them to confirm on the confirmation page after they picked the workspace in this case? 🤔

@cristipaval
Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify thanks for looking into it. Yes, from the user perspective I think it's best to convert in the confirm page 👍

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

So while we are submitting to someone, we change the unit based on target workspace. Is that correct? @cristipaval

cc: @FitseTLT

@FitseTLT
Copy link
Contributor Author

FitseTLT commented Mar 11, 2026

Here is how I understand the confusion. A track expense has distance(let say 4mi), rate, amount. The rate was the default rate of policyForMovingExpense with unit mi.

  1. Scenario 1: now we want to submit it to a different workspace with unit km. When we navigate to confirmation page the distance is in mi (track unit) but the confirm page enforces you to select a rate from the policy so when you select everything will be converted to km. We are good to go.
  2. Scenario 2: let say we changed the unit of the policyForMovingExpense to km. When we submit it to policyForMovingExpense on confirm page the unit will be in previous mi unit. And if you open the distance rate page the selected rate is in the previous unit(the track expense transaction unit). But the problem is if you submit it when it is created the BE will set it from 4 mi to 4km so that the amount remains constant between the tracked and submitted one. Look at the vid.
2026-03-11.16-05-27.mp4

It is a bit confusing scenario I need guidance on the expected behavior it is not only a matter of unit. What do we make consistent the distance or amount? cc @trjExpensify @cristipaval

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

If this rate is not valid for the workspace you selected, isn't it better to show the rate invalid for this workspace error on the confirmation page after you chose the workspace to prompt you to choose a rate that is actually valid instead?

image image

@FitseTLT
Copy link
Contributor Author

If this rate is not valid for the workspace you selected, isn't it better to show the rate invalid for this workspace error on the confirmation page after you chose the workspace to prompt you to choose a rate that is actually valid instead?

image image

The problem is the rate is valid as the transaction rate/customUnitRateID already exists in the policy but when we change a unit of a workspace the rates with the same value (numerical value) will have their distance unit changed(this behavior also applies for currency change) So now we will have a different rates on the transaction vs on the workspace.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not following you. On Classic, there's an error that says "Unit no longer valid" so we do know somehow when the unit of a distance rate on an expense is invalid on a given workspace.

image

@FitseTLT
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not following you. On Classic, there's an error that says "Unit no longer valid" so we do know somehow when the unit of a distance rate on an expense is invalid on a given workspace.

image

Ofcourse we can know @trjExpensify I want to get a direction into what to implement. Note that rate basically includes unit, currency and numerical value. So let's say a track expense was created with an old value (interms of any of three info I mentioned) when we submit it we should show rate no longer valid if the rate is changed. cc @cristipaval Pls tell me the expected behavior and let's finish this thing.

@cristipaval
Copy link
Contributor

cristipaval commented Mar 12, 2026

@FitseTLT, I chatted with @trjExpensify, and we want the following logic when the user lands on the confirmation page:

  1. Look at the rate stored for the transaction (customUnitID and customUnitRateID)

    1.1 If the transaction rate is valid for the target workspace ✅

    • Do nothing

    1.2 The transaction rate is not valid ❌

    • Show a violation on the rate field
    • The user clicks on the rate to fix the violation
    • The App displays the rate selection page with only the valid rates from the target workspace
    • The user picks a valid rate, and the violation is cleared
  2. Look at the distance stored on the transaction (distance and distanceUnit)

    2.1 The distanceUnit is the same as the rate unit ✅

    • Do nothing

    2.2 The distanceUnit is different than the rate unit ❌

    • Show a violation on the distance field
    • The user clicks on the distance to fix the violation
    • The App displays the distance input page with the valid unit of the rate
    • The user clicks the Save button, and the violation is cleared

cc @parasharrajat

@FitseTLT
Copy link
Contributor Author

@FitseTLT, I chatted with @trjExpensify, and we want the following logic when the user lands on the confirmation page:

  1. Look at the rate stored for the transaction (customUnitID and customUnitRateID)
    1.1 If the transaction rate is valid for the target workspace ✅

    • Do nothing

    1.2 The transaction rate is not valid ❌

    • Show a violation on the rate field
    • The user clicks on the rate to fix the violation
    • The App displays the rate selection page with only the valid rates from the target workspace
    • The user picks a valid rate, and the violation is cleared

@cristipaval @trjExpensify If you are judging rate equality via customUnitRateID then the current behavior already aligns with the above. I am asking about how it behaves when a rate's numeric value or unit or currency(wsp) changes after creating the track expense.

  1. Look at the distance stored on the transaction (distance and distanceUnit)
    2.1 The distanceUnit is the same as the rate unit ✅

    • Do nothing

    2.2 The distanceUnit is different than the rate unit ❌

    • Show a violation on the distance field
    • The user clicks on the distance to fix the violation
    • The App displays the distance input page with the valid unit of the rate
    • The user clicks the Save button, and the violation is cleared

cc @parasharrajat

This also doesn't look logical behavior to me. If the track was 2mi then the unit changed to km, current behavior is shows in mi in confirm page but when you open the distance it displays it converting it to 3.22km. If having different unit is not allowed/violation then we know the value should be converted into the new unit(and fortunately we can do that in FE) automatically why do we need the users involvement? I mean at least the rate out of policy case we don't know what the user wants to select but here it doesn't make sense.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

2.2 The distanceUnit is different than the rate unit ❌

Show a violation on the distance field
The user clicks on the distance to fix the violation
The App displays the distance input page with the valid unit of the rate
The user clicks the Save button, and the violation is cleared

Ah, I think I arrived at a different conclusion on this one. I think the error should be shown on the rate field, as the distance rate in use (say 0.45p / mile) is invalid compared to the updated rate of the workspace (say 0.45p / km). So basically the same experience as 1.2

@FitseTLT
Copy link
Contributor Author

FitseTLT commented Mar 12, 2026

2.2 The distanceUnit is different than the rate unit ❌
Show a violation on the distance field
The user clicks on the distance to fix the violation
The App displays the distance input page with the valid unit of the rate
The user clicks the Save button, and the violation is cleared

Ah, I think I arrived at a different conclusion on this one. I think the error should be shown on the rate field, as the distance rate in use (say 0.45p / mile) is invalid compared to the updated rate of the workspace (say 0.45p / km). So basically the same experience as 1.2

Hmmmm. This rate out of policy case will be a bit odd compared to the existing cases. Because on the rate selection page the current transaction rate (which is identified by customUnitRateID) will appear as selected as the rate already exists in the workspace only the unit is changed. And @cristipaval changing the selection logic (to be based also on the unit etc..) will be an unfavorable specialized workaround solution (Let me know your opinion from implementation perspective) So why don't we just auto update the rate to the new workspace value/unit when a track expense is submitted?

Note. BTW this problem already exist on main. If you change the unit of a rate then already created transactions will have an old rate unit and it will only change to the new unit if you reselect the rate. The new issue linked to this pr is that we are moving a track expense into a workspace space.

@FitseTLT
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cristipaval on the ^

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Bump @cristipaval on this.

@cristipaval
Copy link
Contributor

cristipaval commented Mar 24, 2026

@FitseTLT @parasharrajat, what I understand is that right now, everything is covered, except for the following scenario:

  1. I have the default workspace with 2 distance rates: Default rate $0.67/mile, and Executive rate $1.1/mile
  2. I create a tracked distance expense for a 10-mile distance and the Executive rate
Screenshot 2026-03-24 at 10 42 23
  1. I go to Workspace Settings -> Distance rates -> Settings and change the Unit to kilometers.
    • This updates the unit on all rates.
  2. I go to the selfDM and start submitting the tracked distance created at step 2 to the default workspace

What we are discussing here is what to show on the confirmation page, correct?
The screenshot below is what the current PR displays
Screenshot 2026-03-24 at 10 46 10

I think @trjExpensify was saying here that we could detect whether the amount was calculated with the expense rate using the old unit and show a violation in the rate field, as in Classic.

Then, when the user clicks on the Rate field to fix the violation, show the page with the updated workspace rates, and no rate selected by default. So the user can only pick a rate with the updated unit. Once the user picks the rate, we convert the distance to the new unit and update the amount accordingly. @trjExpensify, do I get this right?

@cristipaval cristipaval self-requested a review March 25, 2026 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants