Skip to content

[CP Staging] fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45#85767

Merged
mountiny merged 2 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
margelo:@chrispader/dowgrade-onyx-to-v3.0.45
Mar 19, 2026
Merged

[CP Staging] fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45#85767
mountiny merged 2 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
margelo:@chrispader/dowgrade-onyx-to-v3.0.45

Conversation

@chrispader
Copy link
Contributor

@chrispader chrispader commented Mar 19, 2026

@mountiny

Explanation of Change

This is one of two PRs which revert recent Onyx bumps that cause deploy blockers related to issues with attachment/receipt upload

This reverts the Onyx bump from version 3.0.45 to 3.0.46.

Fixed Issues

$ #85755
$ #85669
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Open a report
  2. Send an attachment
  3. Make sure that the attachment is uploaded and there is no "No content" error

  1. Open a report
  2. Create an expense
  3. Upload an image/PDF
  4. Finish the expense
  5. Make sure the expense is uploaded and the receipt preview is showing the receipt

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Open a report
  2. Send an attachment
  3. Make sure that the attachment is uploaded and there is no "No content" error

  1. Open a report
  2. Create an expense
  3. Upload an image/PDF
  4. Finish the expense
  5. Make sure the expense is uploaded and the receipt preview is showing the receipt

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

…ckyStash/refactor/bump-onyx-3.0.46"

This reverts commit 572af3b, reversing
changes made to b12722f.
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

@chrispader chrispader changed the title fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 to resolve deploy blockers fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 to resolve deploy blockers [2/2] Mar 19, 2026
@chrispader chrispader changed the title fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 to resolve deploy blockers [2/2] [HOLD on https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/85766]fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 to resolve deploy blockers [2/2] Mar 19, 2026
@chrispader chrispader marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2026 11:47
@chrispader chrispader requested review from a team as code owners March 19, 2026 11:47
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ZhenjaHorbach and joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team March 19, 2026 11:47
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 19, 2026

@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 19, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
2026-03-19.12.48.27.mov
2026-03-19.12.52.12.mov

if (!policyID) {
return;
}
if (policyID && policyID.length > 0) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-8 (docs)

updateLastAccessedWorkspace(policyID) is a side effect (Onyx.set) called directly in the component render body. This will execute on every render, including re-renders caused by unrelated state or prop changes, React Strict Mode double-invocations, and concurrent rendering retries. The previous useEffect approach was correct because it limited execution to when policyID actually changed.

Restore the useEffect wrapper:

useEffect(() => {
    if (!policyID) {
        return;
    }
    updateLastAccessedWorkspace(policyID);
}, [policyID]);

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.


const isFocused = useIsFocused();
const isFocusedRef = useRef(isFocused);
useFocusEffect(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-12 (docs)

The setTimeout inside the useFocusEffect callback has no cleanup mechanism. If the screen loses focus or the component unmounts before CONST.ANIMATED_TRANSITION elapses, the timer callback will still fire, potentially calling scrollToIndex on an unmounted or stale ref. The previous implementation guarded against this with isFocusedRef.current, but that guard has been removed.

Return a cleanup function from the useFocusEffect callback to clear the timer:

useFocusEffect(
    useCallback(() => {
        const index = carouselTransactions.findIndex(...);
        if (index < 0) {
            return;
        }
        const newTransaction = carouselTransactions.at(index);
        const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => {
            if (newTransaction?.transactionID !== carouselTransactionsRef.current.at(index)?.transactionID) {
                return;
            }
            carouselRef.current?.scrollToIndex({ ... });
        }, CONST.ANIMATED_TRANSITION);

        return () => clearTimeout(timeoutId);
        // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
    }, [newTransactionIDs]),
);

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
}, [newTransactionIDs]),
);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-5 (docs)

The eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps comment lacks a justification explaining why the dependencies are intentionally omitted (e.g., carouselTransactions and styles are used in the callback but not listed).

Add an explanatory comment before the disable:

// We only want to scroll to a new transaction when the set of new transaction IDs changes.
// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

@mountiny mountiny changed the title [HOLD on https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/85766]fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 to resolve deploy blockers [2/2] [CP Staging] fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 to resolve deploy blockers [2/2] Mar 19, 2026
@chrispader chrispader changed the title [CP Staging] fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 to resolve deploy blockers [2/2] [NoQA] fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 to resolve deploy blockers [2/2] Mar 19, 2026
@chrispader chrispader changed the title [NoQA] fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 to resolve deploy blockers [2/2] [CP Staging] fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45 Mar 19, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Straight revert of #85248

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 19, 2026

@mountiny
Should we also revert these changes?
#85527

But probably we have no choice
So as not to break anything else 😅
CC: @chrispader

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 872a52a112

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

const isFocused = useIsFocused();
// We only want to highlight the new expenses if the screen is focused.
const newTransactionIDs = new Set(newTransactions.map((transaction) => transaction.transactionID));
const newTransactionIDs = isFocused ? new Set(newTransactions.map((transaction) => transaction.transactionID)) : undefined;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Preserve new transaction IDs while the preview is unfocused

useNewTransactions() only reports additions on the render where the transaction list grows (src/hooks/useNewTransactions.ts:17-26). By replacing the set with undefined whenever useIsFocused() is false, a transaction that arrives while this preview is mounted in the background is dropped on that one render, and the next focus render already treats the updated list as the baseline. In practice, expenses created while another screen is on top will never be highlighted or auto-scrolled when the user returns to this preview.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +563 to +567
setTimeout(() => {
// If the new transaction is not available at the index it was on before the delay, avoid the scrolling
// because we are scrolling to either a wrong or unavailable transaction (which can cause crash).
if (newTransaction?.transactionID !== carouselTransactionsRef.current.at(index)?.transactionID) {
return;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Cancel the delayed carousel scroll when the screen blurs

This setTimeout() now survives a blur because useFocusEffect is not returning a cleanup and the previous isFocusedRef.current check was removed. If the user navigates away within CONST.ANIMATED_TRANSITION after a new expense arrives, stack navigators that keep the old screen mounted will still execute scrollToIndex() against the hidden carousel, so coming back later can land on an unexpected item. The earlier implementation explicitly skipped this delayed scroll once the screen lost focus.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from MonilBhavsar March 19, 2026 12:02
@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny Should we also revert these changes? #85527

But probably we have no choice So as not to break anything else 😅 CC: @chrispader

But never mind
We already reverted these changes 😅

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...portActionItem/MoneyRequestReportPreview/index.tsx 90.32% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/withPolicy.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ReportPreview/MoneyRequestReportPreviewContent.tsx 61.87% <44.44%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
... and 24 files with indirect coverage changes

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, asked QA for a retest of the blocker

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 5277b58 into Expensify:main Mar 19, 2026
49 checks passed
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2026
…3.0.45

[CP Staging] fix: Downgrade Onyx to v3.0.45

(cherry picked from commit 5277b58)

(cherry-picked to staging by mountiny)
@OSBotify OSBotify added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Mar 19, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.40-5 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.40-10 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.41-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

VickyStash added a commit to callstack-internal/Expensify-App that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2026
…owgrade-onyx-to-v3.0.45"

This reverts commit 5277b58, reversing
changes made to 7933470.
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.41-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants