Skip to content

fix: android pressability issue with measureAsyncOnUI patch (v5)#86708

Merged
puneetlath merged 5 commits intomainfrom
claude-fixPressabilityNewArch-v5
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

fix: android pressability issue with measureAsyncOnUI patch (v5)#86708
puneetlath merged 5 commits intomainfrom
claude-fixPressabilityNewArch-v5

Conversation

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot MelvinBot commented Mar 31, 2026

Explanation of Change

This PR adds a react-native patch based on the upstream PR facebook/react-native#51835 to fix an Android-specific issue where onPress events do not trigger for Pressable components when used inside a Tooltip on certain Samsung devices.

Root Cause: In the new architecture, Pressability.measure() reads layout information from the shadow tree. When a tooltip uses a Reanimated animation (e.g., scale: 0 during entry), the shadow tree retains the stale value while the UI thread has already updated. This causes Pressability to incorrectly compute the pressable region as having zero size, making the button untappable.

Fix: Introduces a new measureAsyncOnUI method that measures views using the native view hierarchy on the UI thread instead of the shadow tree. This ensures correct measurements even when Reanimated has modified the view's transform on the native side.

The patch modifies:

  • JS: Pressability.js to call measureAsyncOnUI instead of measure; adds measureAsyncOnUI to FabricUIManager, ReactFabricHostComponent, ReactNativeElement, and type definitions
  • C++ (shared): Adds measureAsyncOnUI binding in UIManagerBinding.cpp, with delegation through UIManagerDelegateSchedulerSchedulerDelegate
  • iOS: Implements async measurement in RCTMountingManager using RCTExecuteOnMainQueue with native view hierarchy measurement; also patches the pre-generated FBReactNativeSpecJSI.h codegen header to register the measureAsyncOnUI TurboModule method
  • Android: Implements async measurement through FabricUIManagerMountingManager using MountItem dispatch to UI thread, with native view hierarchy measurement via bounding box computation

Also removes the createPressHandler workaround (which used onPressIn instead of onPress on Android) since this patch properly fixes the root cause.

Fixed Issues

$ #59953

Tests

  1. Open the app on an Android device (ideally a Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 or similar affected device)
  2. Sign in to a new account or one that triggers product training tooltips
  3. When a tooltip appears (e.g., near the Concierge chat), tap the X button to dismiss it
  4. Verify the tooltip dismisses on tap (onPress fires correctly)
  5. If action button tooltips appear, verify "Try it out" and "No thanks" buttons work
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests - tooltip dismissal is a local UI interaction and should work identically offline.

QA Steps

  1. On an Android device (preferably Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 / Android 14), sign in to an account
  2. Trigger a product training tooltip (new account or cleared tooltip state)
  3. Verify the X button on the tooltip is tappable and dismisses the tooltip
  4. Verify other Pressable components inside tooltips work correctly
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

This bug requires a specific Samsung device (e.g., Galaxy Z Fold 4) to reproduce. The patch is based on the upstream react-native fix.

Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A - This is a native-only issue (Fabric/new arch)

iOS: Native

N/A - This is an Android-specific issue

iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A - This is an Android-specific issue

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A - This is an Android-specific issue

Re-apply the changes from PR #86160 which was reverted. Adds a
react-native patch based on upstream facebook/react-native#51835
to fix onPress events not triggering for Pressable components
inside Tooltips on certain Samsung devices.

Also removes the createPressHandler workaround since this patch
properly fixes the root cause.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot Please replace this with a new patch below
react-native+0.83.1+034+fix-pressability-new-arch.patch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done! Replaced the patch with the new version. The updated patch includes:

  • Fixed ObjC format specifier from %@ to %ld for reactTag
  • Returns a proper zeroed-out array instead of empty {} when a view can't be found
  • Added safety check for invalid dynamic array in the C++ callback

Commit: d702ac5

- Fix ObjC format specifier from %@ to %ld for reactTag
- Return zeroed array instead of empty object when view not found
- Add safety check for invalid dynamic array in C++ callback

Co-authored-by: Linh Vo <linhvovan29546@users.noreply.github.com>
@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot Please remove this note Note: This PR is a recreation of https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/86707 without the Co-authored-by trailer in the commit, per assignee request. All changes are identical. from PR description

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done! Removed the recreation note from the PR description.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/ProductTrainingContext/index.tsx 91.22% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot Please make the PR ready for review

@MelvinBot MelvinBot marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2026 05:49
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested review from a team as code owners March 31, 2026 05:49
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done! PR has been marked as ready for review. ✅

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from linhvovan29546 March 31, 2026 05:49
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 31, 2026

@linhvovan29546 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team March 31, 2026 05:49
@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

linhvovan29546 commented Mar 31, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

N/A original screenshot here #86160 (comment)

Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A original screenshot here #86160 (comment)

iOS: HybridApp

N/A original screenshot here #86160 (comment)

Screen.Recording.2026-03-31.at.12.46.51.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A original screenshot here #86160 (comment)

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A original screenshot here #86160 (comment)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d702ac575d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +158 to +160
+ if (!result) {
+ // TODO: add error handling callback
+ return;
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Invoke measure callback on failure paths

If mountingManager.measureAsyncOnUI(...) fails, this code returns without invoking callback. In that failure case (e.g., tag/root missing during unmount races), Pressability never receives measurement data and can leave the press region unresolved for that interaction, causing missed taps instead of a graceful no-op. Please call the callback with a zeroed measurement (like the iOS branch does) rather than returning early.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot Please apply the fix #86708 (comment)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done! Applied the fix from the review comment. On the Android failure path, the callback is now invoked with zeroed measurements (callback.invoke(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)) instead of returning without calling it, matching the iOS behavior.

Commit: daab92c


+ +measureAsyncOnUI: (
+ nativeElementReference: mixed,
+ callback: MeasureInWindowOnSuccessCallback,
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Use MeasureOnSuccess callback type for measureAsyncOnUI

The new Spec signature uses MeasureInWindowOnSuccessCallback (4 args), but the same method is declared as MeasureOnSuccessCallback (6 args) in RefinedSpec and implemented with 6 values in native code. This mismatch can desynchronize generated RN bindings/types during codegen or future patch refreshes and make callback arity inconsistent across layers. The Spec declaration should match MeasureOnSuccessCallback.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MelvinBot Please check

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in 72b78b4. Changed MeasureInWindowOnSuccessCallback (4 args) to MeasureOnSuccessCallback (6 args) in the Spec interface to match the RefinedSpec declaration and native implementation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment appears to be a false positive. Both Spec and RefinedSpec already use MeasureOnSuccessCallback (6 args) for measureAsyncOnUI — there is no mismatch with MeasureInWindowOnSuccessCallback.

Evidence from the patch:

  • Spec (NativeDOM.js): callback: MeasureOnSuccessCallback
  • RefinedSpec (NativeDOM.js): callback: MeasureOnSuccessCallback
  • HostInstance.js: callback: MeasureOnSuccessCallback
  • ReactNativeElement.js: callback: MeasureOnSuccessCallback
  • Native code (iOS/Android/C++): all return 6 values (x, y, width, height, pageX, pageY) matching MeasureOnSuccessCallback

No changes needed — the callback types are already consistent across all layers.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

All CI checks are passing! Here's the summary:

  • Lint/Format: ESLint, Prettier, spellcheck — all pass
  • Tests: All 8 test jobs pass, perf-tests pass, storybook tests pass
  • Builds: Android HybridApp, iOS HybridApp, Debug builds — all pass
  • Typecheck: Pass
  • Patches: validate-patches — pass (the updated patch is valid)
  • Other: CLA, codecov, Snyk, signed commits — all pass

The updated patch (react-native+0.83.1+034+fix-pressability-new-arch.patch) is working correctly with all checks green.

Change MeasureInWindowOnSuccessCallback (4 args) to
MeasureOnSuccessCallback (6 args) in the Spec interface to match
the RefinedSpec declaration and native implementation which both
return 6 values.

Co-authored-by: Linh Vo <linhvovan29546@users.noreply.github.com>
@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot Please check this comment #86708 (comment)

Instead of returning without calling the callback when
measureAsyncOnUI fails, invoke callback with zeroed values
to match iOS behavior and prevent unresolved press regions.

Co-authored-by: Linh Vo <linhvovan29546@users.noreply.github.com>
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 31, 2026

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #59953 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from puneetlath March 31, 2026 07:46
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@joekaufmanexpensify joekaufmanexpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixing this makes sense to me

puneetlath
puneetlath previously approved these changes Apr 1, 2026
@puneetlath
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry, there are conflicts now.

Also, anything we can do to bump that upstream PR to try and get it merged?

@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Also, anything we can do to bump that upstream PR to try and get it merged?

The upstream is taking too long to get merged

@linhvovan29546
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot Please resolve conflict

Main branch added patch 034 (fix-fabric-collapsed-accessibility-announcement)
so our pressability patch is renumbered to 035 to avoid conflict.

Co-authored-by: Linh Vo <linhvovan29546@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot MelvinBot dismissed stale reviews from puneetlath and joekaufmanexpensify via 2f2e42c April 1, 2026 15:07
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Resolved the merge conflict. Main branch added patch 034 (fix-fabric-collapsed-accessibility-announcement), so I renumbered our pressability patch from 034 to 035 and updated details.md accordingly.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from puneetlath April 1, 2026 15:18
@puneetlath puneetlath merged commit e43a7d6 into main Apr 1, 2026
46 checks passed
@puneetlath puneetlath deleted the claude-fixPressabilityNewArch-v5 branch April 1, 2026 15:44
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2026

🚧 @puneetlath has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 1, 2026

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 2, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.3.52-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

No help site changes are required for this PR.

This PR is a low-level Android bug fix — it adds a react-native patch to fix onPress not firing inside tooltips on certain Samsung devices (new architecture). The changes are:

  • A new react-native patch (measureAsyncOnUI)
  • Removal of the createPressHandler workaround
  • Minor cleanup in ProductTrainingContext/index.tsx

No user-facing features, settings, workflows, or UI labels were added, renamed, or changed. The existing tooltip behavior is preserved — it just works correctly now on affected devices. There's nothing here that would require updates to App/docs/articles.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 7, 2026

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.52-9 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants