-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Open
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request
Description
Context
Probably related to #922, #923, #924: The word "tenant" is used through many repositories (create a tenant, promote a tenant) but it is very confusing because the context is not conveyed. These are Developer Studio tenants, not tenants in various products. For example, my group also has a multi-tenant/multi-region product, so when consumers of that product see information about "tenants" in public repos without context, it's not obvious that these things don't pertain to them.
Solution
Anywhere "tenant" is referenced, qualify it with the product unless it's obvious otherwise.
- In README documentation, unless the product has been made clear first in the content, require qualification of the word "tenant" to be alongside the product name (e.g., "content for Developer Studio tenants" not "content for tenants").
- In repository descriptions, require qualification of the word "tenant" even if the product name is right in the name of the repo. ("Config and scripts for Developer Studio tenants")
Alternatives
One alternative might be to remove use of the term "tenant" altogether but it seems like qualifying it with a product name would solve the problem better.
Additional Context
No response
Region
No response
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request