Enhancing the Solr schema update script. See #6529#6530
Merged
kcondon merged 2 commits intoIQSS:developfrom Jan 16, 2020
Merged
Enhancing the Solr schema update script. See #6529#6530kcondon merged 2 commits intoIQSS:developfrom
kcondon merged 2 commits intoIQSS:developfrom
Conversation
pdurbin
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2020
Contributor
Author
Member
|
@poikilotherm thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Enhances the
updateSchemaMDB.shto safeguard the processing when downloading from a non-bootstrapped Dataverse installation.Which issue(s) this PR closes:
Closes #6529
Special notes for your reviewer:
n/a
Suggestions on how to test this:
n/a (see Cloud & Container Guide for live action)
Does this PR introduce a user interface change?:
No.
Is there a release notes update needed for this change?:
IMHO it's to small. If @djbrooke votes to have one, sure.
Additional documentation:
n/a