fix lu deprecation warnings on Julia nightly#434
Conversation
|
Should we put these in Compat.jl instead? |
|
I thought about that, but wasn't sure defining |
|
I don't think we are in any rush to fix this. |
|
Ah, looking at the Julia PR again it seems like |
let's do this |
| # https://sethaxen.com/blog/2021/02/differentiating-the-lu-decomposition/ | ||
|
|
||
| const _RowMaximum = VERSION >= v"1.7.0-DEV.1188" ? RowMaximum : Val{true} | ||
| const _NoPivot = VERSION >= v"1.7.0-DEV.1188" ? NoPivot : Val{false} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need to call this LU_NoPivot
since we will want this to differ for QR?
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #434 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.39% 98.39%
=======================================
Files 21 21
Lines 1989 1989
=======================================
Hits 1957 1957
Misses 32 32
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Co-authored-by: Lyndon White <oxinabox@ucc.asn.au>
ref JuliaDiff/ChainRulesTestUtils.jl#165. I will bump the version as well once #434 is merged so that PkgEval picks this up.
Ref JuliaLang/julia#40623 Co-authored-by: Lyndon White <oxinabox@ucc.asn.au>
ref JuliaDiff/ChainRulesTestUtils.jl#165. I will bump the version as well once #434 is merged so that PkgEval picks this up.
Ref JuliaLang/julia#40623