Conversation
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Maybe add a @inferred test? |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #465 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.16% 93.16%
=======================================
Files 52 52
Lines 1259 1259
=======================================
Hits 1173 1173
Misses 86 86
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@theogf done! |
|
Thanks for the swift review @theogf -- will merge when CI passes |
|
@theogf looks like Others on 1.3 is failing on the doctests -- the formatting of the type printing appears to be different for that version. I don't know how tests were passing previously, because presumably this hasn't changed... 😬 Any thoughts? |
|
Probably the doctestfilter don't catch so many types or something? Didn't we mention dropping 1.3 anyways? |
|
Cool. I'm just going to drop CI for 1.3 |
|
Nvm, figured it out :) |
Summary
Makes the type of
out_dimfield ofMOInputa type parameter ofMOInput. This has been done in a non-breaking way.Proposed changes
See summary
What alternatives have you considered?
#405 consides an alternative approach in which the type is constrained to
Int. This has the disadvantage of being more constrained, and constituting a break change. The potential advantage over the approach used here is slight changes in compile time, but my instinct is that these will be negligible.Breaking changes
None