Skip to content

Conversation

@labkey-jeckels
Copy link
Contributor

Rationale

In #3227 we got stricter about ensuring the extensible tables were set up correctly. We didn't account for rows that might have been inserted before the table had custom fields configured though, which may not have an LSID value yet.

Changes

  • Be tolerant of rows that have a null LSID value but still make sure LSI was returned from DB query

@labkey-jeckels labkey-jeckels requested review from a team and ankurjuneja December 20, 2022 18:55
@labkey-jeckels labkey-jeckels merged commit 39e8199 into release22.7-SNAPSHOT Dec 20, 2022
@labkey-jeckels labkey-jeckels deleted the 22.7_fb_46985_missingLsidForExtensibleTable branch December 20, 2022 22:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants