Conversation
mambda is a dropin replacement for the conda CLI but faster
|
Test failure might be related to #2958 ? It does look like switching to mamba shaves off a couple of minute from build time. |
|
I am going to restart the failing test. For the record, here is the error we had: |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2983 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 93.05% 93.05%
========================================
Files 186 186
Lines 24609 24609
Branches 3187 3187
========================================
Hits 22900 22900
Misses 1661 1661
Partials 48 48 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
The real gain will be when ci-helpers will make micromamba available (astropy/ci-helpers#458). For now, the environment is still created using conda. |
IAlibay
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm!
I don't have any experience with mamba, so just in case there's someone with strong opinions on this switch (@MDAnalysis/coredevs ?) I'll leave it for ~ 24h and merge tomorrow.
Not an issue targetted fix. Improve CI (no user facing changes) - Overview mamba is a dropin replacement for the conda CLI but faster - Work done in this PR Enabled the `MAMBA` environment variable keyword for the CI helper. (cherry picked from commit 2ee4e9d)
Not an issue targetted fix. Improve CI (no user facing changes) - Overview mamba is a dropin replacement for the conda CLI but faster - Work done in this PR Enabled the `MAMBA` environment variable keyword for the CI helper. (cherry picked from commit 2ee4e9d)
Not an issue targetted fix. ## Overview mamba is a dropin replacement for the conda CLI but faster ## Work done in this PR Enabled the `MAMBA` environment variable keyword for the CI helper.
mamba is a drop-in replacement for the conda CLI but faster
Hopefully, this will make CI goes faster by saving on install time.
PR Checklist
[ ] Tests?[ ] Docs?