refactor(keyring-controller): ensure authorization contract address is provided #5353
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ccharly
reviewed
Feb 18, 2025
ccharly
changed the title
ccharly
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2025
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2025
<!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> `@metamask/keyring-controller` is being updated to 19.2.2 including the following changes: ```markdown ## [19.2.2] ### Fixed - Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) ## [19.2.1] ### Changed - Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) - Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](MetaMask/core#5356)), ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) ### Fixed - Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](MetaMask/core#5353)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
mikesposito
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-extension
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2025
<!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Bumping `@metamask/keyring-controller` to 19.2.2 ```markdown ## [19.2.2] ### Fixed - Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) ## [19.2.1] ### Changed - Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) - Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](MetaMask/core#5356)), ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) ### Fixed - Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](MetaMask/core#5353)) ``` [](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/31293?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Related: #31200 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Start with an installation from before we introduced keyringsMetadata, proceed past onboarding so that you have a vault setup (e.g. v12.12.0) 2. Upgrade to this branch 3. Start the extension (without logging in) 4. Leave the window open a while to give it time to initialize all controllers 5. Reload the extension before unlocking 6. Try to unlock the wallet ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2025
<!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> `@metamask/keyring-controller` is being updated to 19.2.2 including the following changes: ```markdown ## [19.2.2] ### Fixed - Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) ## [19.2.1] ### Changed - Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) - Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](MetaMask/core#5356)), ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) ### Fixed - Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](MetaMask/core#5353)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2025
<!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> `@metamask/keyring-controller` is being updated to 19.2.2 including the following changes: ```markdown ## [19.2.2] ### Fixed - Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) ## [19.2.1] ### Changed - Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) - Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](MetaMask/core#5356)), ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) ### Fixed - Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](MetaMask/core#5353)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
runway-github bot
pushed a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2025
…o `^19.2.2` (#14229) <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> `@metamask/keyring-controller` is being updated to 19.2.2 including the following changes: ```markdown ## [19.2.2] ### Fixed - Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) ## [19.2.1] ### Changed - Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) - Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](MetaMask/core#5356)), ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) ### Fixed - Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](MetaMask/core#5353)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
MarioAslau
pushed a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2025
…o `^19.2.2` (#14236) - fix: bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^19.2.2` (#14229) <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> `@metamask/keyring-controller` is being updated to 19.2.2 including the following changes: ```markdown ## [19.2.2] ### Fixed - Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) ## [19.2.1] ### Changed - Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) - Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](MetaMask/core#5356)), ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) ### Fixed - Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](MetaMask/core#5353)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. [99faccf](99faccf) Co-authored-by: Michele Esposito <34438276+mikesposito@users.noreply.github.com>
sethkfman
pushed a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2025
<!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> `@metamask/keyring-controller` is being updated to 19.2.2 including the following changes: ```markdown ## [19.2.2] ### Fixed - Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) - Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535)) ## [19.2.1] ### Changed - Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) - Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](MetaMask/core#5356)), ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366)) ### Fixed - Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](MetaMask/core#5353)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/31293?quickstart=1){kind=link}
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#5301 introduced a new method for signing EIP-7702 Authorizations.
This change adds validation to ensure that
contractAddressis specified, rather than type asserting thecontractAddresstoHex.