During the implementation of the new data sometimes the uncertainties have changed name, and, when done consistently within a PR, it might have escaped testing.
This should be revised more generally, but let's keep track of the ones we know for now:
Note: keeping the old names for the uncertainties when they are correlated between dataset will allow us to mix legacy and not legacy datasets, which sooner or later will be necessary.
During the implementation of the new data sometimes the uncertainties have changed name, and, when done consistently within a PR, it might have escaped testing.
This should be revised more generally, but let's keep track of the ones we know for now:
ATLASLUMI12, it should be updated in the top data link @t7phyNote: keeping the old names for the uncertainties when they are correlated between dataset will allow us to mix legacy and not legacy datasets, which sooner or later will be necessary.