fix: remove sft-qwen2.5-fsdp2tp8sp from nighlies

[ahmadki]

What does this PR do ?

sequence parallel + tp_size >1 is currently broken in torch==2.8.0, no point in running the test as it will raise an exception

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Disabled a test pending resolution of a known compatibility issue.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single test case for sft-qwen2.5-32b in the nightly test suite is disabled with a TODO note referencing a torch==2.8.0 compatibility issue. The actual test invocation line is removed and replaced with a commented explanation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Test suite maintenance tests/test_suites/nightly.txt	Disabled functional 32-bit test for sft-qwen2.5-32b; removed test invocation and added TODO comment noting torch==2.8.0 blocker

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Single-file change with minimal scope
• Simple documentation/disabling of a test case
• Clear explanation provided via TODO comment

Possibly related PRs

• chore: major version bump (torch 2.8, vllm 0.11, ray 2.49) & SP fixes #1334: Overlapping edits to the same nightly test-suite file affecting the same 32B test entries.

Suggested labels

CI

Suggested reviewers

• parthchadha
• guyueh1
• yfw

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'fix: remove sft-qwen2.5-fsdp2tp8sp from nighlies' accurately describes the main change: disabling/removing a nightly test due to a torch 2.8.0 compatibility issue.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Test Results For Major Changes	✅ Passed	PR removes a broken test in nightly suite due to known torch==2.8.0 issue. Minor maintenance change, not a major code change requiring test results documentation.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch ahmadki/disable_llm_sft_qwen2_5_32b_4n8g_fsdp2tp8sp_actckpt_v3

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c371a9 and 3e8526c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/test_suites/nightly.txt (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (1)

📚 Learning: 2025-10-12T14:46:57.171Z

Learnt from: zpqiu
Repo: NVIDIA-NeMo/RL PR: 1324
File: tests/test_suites/llm/distillation-qwen3-32b-to-1.7b-base-1n8g-megatron-tp2pp2cp2-pack.sh:6-11
Timestamp: 2025-10-12T14:46:57.171Z
Learning: Test scripts in tests/test_suites/llm/ follow a standard configuration pattern that includes NUM_NODES, STEPS_PER_RUN, MAX_STEPS, NUM_RUNS (calculated as `$(( (MAX_STEPS + STEPS_PER_RUN - 1) / STEPS_PER_RUN ))`), and NUM_MINUTES. These variables are part of the test infrastructure's standard interface and should not be flagged as unused even if not directly referenced within the individual script, as they are consumed by external launch tooling or common.env.

Applied to files:

• tests/test_suites/nightly.txt

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)

• GitHub Check: sphinx-build / Build docs
• GitHub Check: Lint check
• GitHub Check: Lint check
• GitHub Check: Post submodule check comment / Comment on PR
• GitHub Check: Post automodel integration comment / Comment on PR

🔇 Additional comments (1)

tests/test_suites/nightly.txt (1)

68-69: Clear documentation and correct pattern for test disablement.

The change correctly disables the sft-qwen2.5-32b test with a well-formatted TODO comment that explains the root cause and references the tracking issue. This follows the established pattern in the file for disabled tests (see lines 26–27, 48–49, 92–94).

The GitHub issue #652 exists and is open with the title "Qwen parallelizer with sequence parallelism," confirming the reference is valid and accessible.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}