Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary — 1 finding
🟡 MODERATE — Contradictory review-round limits (Step 7 vs Rule #4)
Step 7 was updated to allow 3 review rounds, but Rule #4 at the bottom of the file still says:
Max 2 review rounds. After 2 rounds, post remaining findings as PR comments.
An agent following these instructions will encounter contradictory guidance. Since rules are typically treated as hard constraints, the agent will likely obey Rule #4 and cap at 2 rounds — defeating the purpose of this change.
Suggested fix: Update Rule #4 to:
4. **Max 3 review rounds.** After 3 rounds, post remaining findings as PR comments.
Generated by Expert Code Review (auto) for issue #743 · ● 2M
| 3. Commit with descriptive message | ||
|
|
||
| Repeat Steps 6-7 up to **2 times** (max 2 review rounds). | ||
| Repeat Steps 6-7 up to **3 times** (max 3 review rounds). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 MODERATE — Contradictory round-limit instructions
This line now permits 3 review rounds, but Rule 4 (near line 207) still reads:
Max 2 review rounds. After 2 rounds, post remaining findings as PR comments.
An agent executing this workflow will encounter conflicting directives — Step 7 permits 3 rounds while Rule 4 caps at 2. Depending on which instruction the agent prioritizes, behavior is nondeterministic: it may stop early (wasting the intended extra iteration) or ignore the rule entirely.
Suggested fix: Update Rule 4 to match:
-4. **Max 2 review rounds.** After 2 rounds, post remaining findings as PR comments.
+4. **Max 3 review rounds.** After 3 rounds, post remaining findings as PR comments.Flagged by: 3/3 reviewers
Match /fix workflow's 3-round limit.