Conversation
68a74ff to
f473474
Compare
|
Thank you, but I don't think we should do this now since we can't test that we can compile the code without |
|
That's ok. I'm happy to leave this PR to wait until we have finished removing specialization from Also I have some other ideas I am exploring with |
f473474 to
eb87538
Compare
|
FYI I continued to look at I will leave this here for now until the provider pattern to remove specialization from |
|
Just for completeness - my vision is that once we have made this feature gate, we can rework these optimizations to use The feature flag will be a bridge which lets us compile on stable before |
|
FYI I will rebase this after #961 is merged - and (fingers crossed) add a CI for stable rust at the same time. |
|
I will rebase this tonight unless you want me to close this and we focus on #969 ? |
|
I'm sorry I close this PR in favor of #969 |
Add a feature to gate the sequence implementations using buffer + specialization behind feature flag.
Questions:
TODO: