Fix divergence between CRAN version and master#6600
Conversation
* Correct commented argument name * also mismatched bmerge() declaration
* Drop direct use of NAMED Since data.table now depends on R >= 3.3, the backports are no longer needed. Moreover, MAYBE_SHARED is currently a function, while MAYBE_REFERENCED expands to !NO_REFERENCES (which is a function). In debugging output, show MAYBE_REFERENCED (NAMED > 0) instead of NAMED. * Almost drop direct use of LEVELS getCharCE appeared in R-2.7, making it possible to check for strings _marked_ as UTF-8 or Latin-1. There is no marking as ASCII, so fixing IS_ASCII will have to wait for R >= 4.5. * NEWS entry for NAMED, LEVELS reduction * fine-tune NEWS --------- Co-authored-by: Michael Chirico <chiricom@google.com>
* also check plain '-fopenmp' for gcc (closes #6409) * update NEWS * cite in NEWS --------- Co-authored-by: Michael Chirico <chiricom@google.com>
* Compile .mo files for new translations * Track new languages' .mo files * mention omission in NEWS
* omit NA in indices * revisit * better test * change order * NEWS --------- Co-authored-by: Michael Chirico <chiricom@google.com>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6600 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.60% 98.60%
=======================================
Files 79 79
Lines 14516 14518 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 14314 14316 +2
Misses 202 202 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Generated via commit 3819b64 Download link for the artifact containing the test results: ↓ atime-results.zip
|
|
I believe I saw the 1.16.2 NEWS missing from master too, would you mind merging that in this PR as well? |
Done, unfortunately I had to renumber the NEWS items manually. |
|
Sorry about that, oversight on my part. Can PR the NEWS as soon as it's accepted to avoid having to renumber too much. Is there a good way to get the rest of the stuff in there or just a larger PR like this one with the relevant commits to the patch? |
I think this is new territory for all the maintainers, open to ideas. It definitely feels a bit clunky. |

Closes #6587
This PR merge the
patch-1.16.2branch into curentmaster. After resolving the conflicts it shows that we indeed are only missing #6563