Skip to content

Use faster base implementation for isoweek #7144

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
MichaelChirico merged 2 commits into from
Jul 10, 2025
+18 −6

Add an atime regression test

1afb359
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Merged

Use faster base implementation for isoweek #7144

Add an atime regression test
1afb359
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Codecov / codecov/project succeeded Jul 8, 2025 in 0s

98.50% (-0.01%) compared to 038e7f8, passed because coverage increased by 0% when compared to adjusted base (98.50%)

View this Pull Request on Codecov

98.50% (-0.01%) compared to 038e7f8, passed because coverage increased by 0% when compared to adjusted base (98.50%)

Details

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.50%. Comparing base (038e7f8) to head (1afb359).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7144      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.50%   98.50%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          81       81              
  Lines       15015    15014       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        14791    14790       -1     
  Misses        224      224

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
View more details on Codecov